1995
DOI: 10.1109/22.466178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FDTD analysis of high frequency electronic interconnection effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it requires only one LU decomposition and forward-backward substitutions to compute moments. Also, it is easy to note that the lumped networks are a special case of (107) [where for , in which case (107) reduces to the form given by (104)]. Next, (107) requires the derivatives of .…”
Section: B Computation Of Momentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hence, it requires only one LU decomposition and forward-backward substitutions to compute moments. Also, it is easy to note that the lumped networks are a special case of (107) [where for , in which case (107) reduces to the form given by (104)]. Next, (107) requires the derivatives of .…”
Section: B Computation Of Momentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Typically, a package usually has more than one layer of metalization, where different signal lines and ground planes are etched [1]. Also, there are several transitions (via holes) to transmit the signal to the other lines and to connect the ground planes at the different layers of the package [2][3][4]. In general, mutual-coupling effects in these packages are due to the presence of multiple signal lines at the same or different metalization layers and transition discontinuities (via holes) between the different layers in a package are considered to be another source of coupling effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to solve for E c , we apply the Galerkin Method of Moments to equation (2), under the boundary condition (1a). The trial functions φ k ( φ k = 0 on the metal) verify the boundary condition (1b).…”
Section: Computation Of the Input Admittance Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature many techniques have been suggested to characterize these discontinuities [1][2][3][4][5]. The Finite Difference Time Domain method (FDTD) [1,2] and the Finite Element Method (FEM) [3,4] have been used to provide accurate modeling of the discontinuities. Even though these methods are accurate, they are highly expensive in computational time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%