2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility of spent metalworking fluids as co-substrate for anaerobic co-digestion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in general the aerobic process, as compared to the anaerobic one, resulted in better COD removal rates and higher contribution of biodegradation mechanism [14,50]. It thus appears that the anaerobic treatment technology requires further optimization actions such as supplementation with complementary physical-chemical processes, addition of co-substrates and/or extensive bioaugmentation [50,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in general the aerobic process, as compared to the anaerobic one, resulted in better COD removal rates and higher contribution of biodegradation mechanism [14,50]. It thus appears that the anaerobic treatment technology requires further optimization actions such as supplementation with complementary physical-chemical processes, addition of co-substrates and/or extensive bioaugmentation [50,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jagadevan et al (2011) reported 65% COD removal following fenton processing of MWFs, and 92% COD removal with biological treatment following fenton processing. Rodriguez-Verde et al (2014) published a 74% COD removal using pig manure as co-substrate in an anaerobic digester and biogas production of 0.26 L/L day at 0.7 g COD/L day OLR. Batch studies have tested kinetic models of anaerobic treatments in wastewaters from vinasse (Kobya and Demircioglu, 1993;Filikİsç en, 2006), textiles (Gnanapragasam et al, 2011), whey (Ergüder et al, 2000), sunflower meal (Raposo et al, 2009), apples (Kafle and Kim, 2013), corn (Raposo et al, 2006), slaughterhouses (Slimane et al, 2014), and dyes (Hosseini Koupaie, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, Rodriguez‐Verde et al . () examined the anaerobic digestion of spent MWF by testing the BMP and found 25% methane production with a yield of 15.6 l CH 4 per kg of spent MWF. They did, however, increase the methane production up to 39% when the spent MWF was mixed with pig manure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over an operating period of 92 days, at an OLR of 11.9-51.3 kgCOD m À3 day À1 they achieved 67.1% COD and 71.3% TOC removal; however, the volumetric rate of biogas formation was very difficult to assess due to the small amounts that were generated. Conversely, Rodriguez-Verde et al (2014) examined the anaerobic digestion of spent MWF by testing the BMP and found 25% methane production with a yield of 15.6 l CH 4 per kg of spent MWF. They did, however, increase the methane production up to 39% when the spent MWF was mixed with pig manure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation