The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. shown that not all attended stimuli give rise to awareness. Controversy still remains over whether, and the extent to which, a dissociation between attention and awareness encompasses all forms of attention. For example, it has been suggested that attention without awareness is more readily demonstrated for voluntary, endogenous attention than its reflexive, exogenous counterpart. Here we examine whether exogenous attentional cueing can have selective behavioural effects on stimuli that nevertheless remain unseen.Using a task in which object-based attention has been shown in the absence of awareness,we remove all possible contingencies between cues and target stimuli to ensure that any cueing effects must be under purely exogenous control, and find evidence of exogenous object-based attention without awareness. In a second experiment we address whether this dissociation crucially depends on the method used to establish that the objects indeed remain unseen. Specifically, to confirm that objects are unseen we adopt appropriate signal detection task procedures, including those that retain parity with the primary attentional task (by requiring participants to discriminate the two types of trial that are used to measure an effect of attention). We show a significant object-based attention effect is apparent under conditions where the selected object indeed remains undetectable.
General IntroductionHistorically, visual attention and visual awareness have often been viewed as being so intimately related that they may be considered aspects of a single underlying process. It is now well established that this is not the case -attention and awareness dissociate under many conditions (McCormick, 1997;Kentridge, Heywood & Weiskrantz, 1999Kentridge, Nijboer & Heywood, 2008;Bahrami, Carmel, Walsh, Rees & Lavie, 2008; Kanai, Tsuchiya & Verstraten, 2006). There is some ambiguity, however, in classic experimental designs manipulating spatial attention (e.g. Posner, 1980) as to whether the unit of attentional selection is a region of space or the object that occupies that space (see e.g.Mole, 2008). One might be perfectly aware of attending to a spatial location even when stimuli appearing at that location remain unseen.This ambiguity is resolved in tests of object-based attention. In this form of attention the 'object' of selection is explicitly provided by the experimenter and it is easy to distinguish between effects that are purely spatial and those involving selection of the cued object. For exa...