2016 11th International Conference on Computer Engineering &Amp; Systems (ICCES) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icces.2016.7822011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature-based sentiment analysis in online Arabic reviews

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2016, the study on MSA was done in lexicon-based using SVM, NB, DT, K-NN and another classifier [52], [53]. Alqasemi et al [52] used the SVM, NB and the k-NN algorithms, which have F1, F2, F3 and F4 features, for carrying out the lexicon-based SA for the Arabic language.…”
Section: Svm Nb Dt and Knnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 2016, the study on MSA was done in lexicon-based using SVM, NB, DT, K-NN and another classifier [52], [53]. Alqasemi et al [52] used the SVM, NB and the k-NN algorithms, which have F1, F2, F3 and F4 features, for carrying out the lexicon-based SA for the Arabic language.…”
Section: Svm Nb Dt and Knnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM showed a maximal accuracy of 76.46%. Abd-Elhamid et al [53] used a Part Of Speech (POS) tagging feature for carrying out an automatic extraction and weighting of sentiment features from the group of annotated reviews. All the collected features were organized into a tree structure, which highlights the relationship between the objects that are being reviewed and other components.…”
Section: Svm Nb Dt and Knnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They have 22000 movie reviews for train set and 3001 movie reviews for test set. While the experiment in [26] used 200 of Arabic user reviews from Forums, Facebook, YouTube, and google search. The researchers stored the reviews in a database tables, then they started data processing by cleaning the text and associated the ratings with the reviews then, they annotated the corpus to organize it into one format (positive, negative, or neutral).…”
Section: Datasets Used In Review Helpfulness Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of summarization is useless in CI because it loses some detailed information, which is important to inform the decision maker of an organization regarding the development and marketing of a product/service. However, summaries based on features provide information about different features and show what customers usually try to search while referring to opinions that rend these types of summaries of great demand in many application domains like: recommender system (Ładyzẏński and Grzegorzewski, 2014 [17]) and trust reputation (Rahimi and Bakkali, 2015 [23]) with different languages such as English (Kansal and Toshniwal, 2014 [15]), Chinese (Zhou et al, 2016 [31]), Arabic (Abd-Elhamid et al, 2016 [1]) and Italian (Maisto and Pelosi, 2014 [21]). However, the large availability of reviews shared in English allows researchers to focus on this language in their works.…”
Section: �� ��Trod�c�o�mentioning
confidence: 99%