22nd IEEE VLSI Test Symposium, 2004. Proceedings.
DOI: 10.1109/vtest.2004.1299254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature extraction based built-in alternate test of RF components using a noise reference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are still 19 problematic samples which cannot be identified with these schemes. One possible solution is to study their oscillations with variable sampling windows, similar to wavelet analysis as in [14], we did not investigate this solution for the sake of simplicity. The reader should keep in mind that these problematic instances were a result of faulty design process, a well-designed mixer does not show this kind of behavior, and otherwise the yield of the product would be extremely poor.…”
Section: Implementation Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are still 19 problematic samples which cannot be identified with these schemes. One possible solution is to study their oscillations with variable sampling windows, similar to wavelet analysis as in [14], we did not investigate this solution for the sake of simplicity. The reader should keep in mind that these problematic instances were a result of faulty design process, a well-designed mixer does not show this kind of behavior, and otherwise the yield of the product would be extremely poor.…”
Section: Implementation Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test compaction methods reduce testing time at a cost of increasing DPPM; defect escapes occur due to skipping the tests that are unlikely to fail but have a nonzero fail probability. Another form of test compaction is to use a set of alternate measurements [4], [5] or using dedicated built-inself-test circuitry that indirectly decides on the pass/fail status of the device [6], [7]. For these techniques, defect escapes occur due to imperfections in the modeling/mapping functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when considering RFIC testing, some issues need to be taken into account such as powerful ADC & DAC, area overhead issue for embedding, power consumption, etc. Presently, some advanced works to develop efficient testing techniques for the RF systems and individually building blocks have been carried out [5][6][7][8][9]. Recent efforts for RF circuit testing have focused on the design of on-chip embedded detectors, or sensors, where the output signals can be tested easily [5,[7][8], and on the methodologies and algorithms for automated test design [6,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, some advanced works to develop efficient testing techniques for the RF systems and individually building blocks have been carried out [5][6][7][8][9]. Recent efforts for RF circuit testing have focused on the design of on-chip embedded detectors, or sensors, where the output signals can be tested easily [5,[7][8], and on the methodologies and algorithms for automated test design [6,9]. Instead of testing the devices specifically for performance metrics, the outputs of the detectors were used to estimate the target test specs when the Circuit-UnderTest (CUT) was stimulated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%