2019
DOI: 10.1177/0361198119846462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeder Bus Timetable Design and Vehicle Size Setting in Peak Hour Demand Conditions

Abstract: This study proposes a solution to the feeder bus timetabling problem, in which the terminal departure times and vehicle sizes are simultaneously determined based on the given transfer passengers and their arrival times at a bus terminal. The problem is formulated as a mixed integer non-linear programming (MINLP) model with the objective of minimizing the transfer waiting time of served passengers, the transfer failure cost of non-served passengers, and the operating costs of bus companies. In addition to train… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for passenger travel cost, transfer factors are not considered in some studies on the optimization of feeder bus routes [19], and transfer factors are introduced in other studies, but some tend to reduce waiting time by optimizing walking distance, departure interval and timetable [10,20] so as to reduce transfer cost. Regarding the transfer factors, this paper considers the impact of station transfer and makes it clear that the generation of different route schemes will change the transfer choice, and the transfer at different stations will make the routes of passengers more diversified, resulting in different travel costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for passenger travel cost, transfer factors are not considered in some studies on the optimization of feeder bus routes [19], and transfer factors are introduced in other studies, but some tend to reduce waiting time by optimizing walking distance, departure interval and timetable [10,20] so as to reduce transfer cost. Regarding the transfer factors, this paper considers the impact of station transfer and makes it clear that the generation of different route schemes will change the transfer choice, and the transfer at different stations will make the routes of passengers more diversified, resulting in different travel costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The satisfactory route was obtained by fuzzy programming and the TOPSIS method. Dou et al [10] proposed a solution to the feeder bus timetabling problem. An MINLP model was developed to minimize the weighted sum of passenger cost and bus operating cost.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several papers consider the integration of TNT and VSP, such as Wu et al (2019) and Dou and Meng (2019). Wu et al (2019) propose a bi-level model for bus schedule coordination design, allowing passengers to modify routes multiple times.…”
Section: Vehicle Scheduling Problem (Vsp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They develop a heuristic algorithm to solve this model and show that a more cost-effective schedule can be obtained by taking rerouting behaviour into consideration. Dou and Meng (2019) propose a mixed-integer program for a feeder bus timetabling problem to minimize transfer waiting, transfer failure cost and bus operational cost. This model can handle both transfer passengers and local passengers whose behavior is constrained by bus capacity during peak hours.…”
Section: Vehicle Scheduling Problem (Vsp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the connection between bus and rail transit, Takamatsu and Taguchi [28] established an event activity network to give vehicle timetable and passenger behavior in the backward areas of public transport in Japan and explored the rationality of train and bus transfer with the constraint of passenger transfer waiting time. Dou and Meng [29], based on exploring the rationality of the transfer between the terminal bus and the railway station, taking the minimization of passenger transfer waiting time as the constraint, and considering the bus capacity and passenger queuing attitude, established an MINLP model to optimize the timetable. Zheng-Wu and Ming-Qun [30] built a two-stage coordinated optimization of the operation lines of the corresponding feeder bus system at multiple transfer points for the mixed demand including reservation demand and real-time demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%