2020
DOI: 10.1364/oe.385609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedforward-enhanced Fock state conversion with linear optics

Abstract: Engineering quantum states of light represents a crucial task in the vast majority of photonic quantum technology applications. Direct manipulation of the number of photons in the light signal, such as single-photon subtraction and addition, proved to be an efficient strategy for the task. Here we propose an adaptive multi-photon subtraction scheme where a particular subtraction task is conditioned by all previous subtraction events in order to maximize the probability of successful subtraction. We theoretical… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electronic delays with tens of picoseconds resolution and dynamic range of hundreds nanoseconds are necessary to compensate for the length fluctuations of optical communication channels 2,3 . DDLs are frequently utilized in photonic quantum technology 4,5 for photon coincidence detection [6][7][8] and switching [9][10][11][12] . These applications require synchronization of several single-photon detectors and active components, like modulators or switches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic delays with tens of picoseconds resolution and dynamic range of hundreds nanoseconds are necessary to compensate for the length fluctuations of optical communication channels 2,3 . DDLs are frequently utilized in photonic quantum technology 4,5 for photon coincidence detection [6][7][8] and switching [9][10][11][12] . These applications require synchronization of several single-photon detectors and active components, like modulators or switches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A difference of the artificial coherent states here to conventional coherent light is that the photons of the artificial coherent state are correlated with others separated by multiples of the loop delay, this is typical for systems with time-delayed feedback [33] including lasers [34,35]. This quantum entanglement becomes accessible if an ordered (pulsed) stream of single photons is used, and enables production of linear cluster states, which has been realized recently [16,17], and feed-forward or fast modulators [14,[36][37][38] can be used to produce even more complex quantum states. We want to add that also lasers produce only approximately coherent states with entanglement of the stimulated photons via the gain medium [39][40][41][42], which is in practice inaccessible due to the impossibility of monitoring every quantum interaction in the system [43].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A difference of the artificial coherent states here to conventional coherent light is that the photons here are entangled with others separated by multiples of the loop delay. This quantum entanglement becomes accessible if an ordered (pulsed) stream of single photons is used, and enables production of linear cluster states which has been realized recently [15,16], and feed-forward or fast modulators [13,[30][31][32] can be used to produce even more complex quantum states. We want to add that also lasers produce only approximately coherent states, entanglement of the stimulated photons via the gain medium is subject to a long debate [33][34][35][36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%