2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-0717(02)00282-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding activity of the earthworm Eisenia andrei in artificial soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gut loading (dry weight soil per dry weight worm) for E. foetida was found to be 0.63 ± 0.022 for mineral soil [46]. A 0.05 fraction of gut content remaining after 24 h depuration has been reported for E. foetida , a value similar to the fraction of gut content (0.056 ± 0.021) remaining for Eisenia Andrei after 24 h depuration [47]. However, the slightly higher values observed for the protein coated-FLG treatment compared to the uncoated FLG suggest that soil remaining in the gut cannot fully explain the uptake results (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Gut loading (dry weight soil per dry weight worm) for E. foetida was found to be 0.63 ± 0.022 for mineral soil [46]. A 0.05 fraction of gut content remaining after 24 h depuration has been reported for E. foetida , a value similar to the fraction of gut content (0.056 ± 0.021) remaining for Eisenia Andrei after 24 h depuration [47]. However, the slightly higher values observed for the protein coated-FLG treatment compared to the uncoated FLG suggest that soil remaining in the gut cannot fully explain the uptake results (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The uptake and elimination of hydrophobic compounds by organisms can be described by monophasic and biphasic kinetics depending on test chemical, organism species, and the environment . According to Belfroid's research, chlorobenzenes in earthworm ( Eisenia andrei ) cultivated with artificial soil (Organization for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD) soil) followed a biphasic elimination, whereas the elimination was monophasic when the earthworms were kept in water .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition the test animals are kept in a plastic pot with that make the worms have no choice for food to consume other than the carbofuran-polluted manure. In natural soil habitat, in fact, the worm does not feed on soil indiscriminately but is able to select an organic matter-enriched diet from the medium [16]. In Eisenia fetida when food quality changed, not only the growth rate of the worms affected, but cocoons production and hatchlings produced significatly decrease as well [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%