Female and environmental disclosure of family and non-family firms. Evidence from India

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to use the gender socialization theory, critical mass theory and legitimacy theory to examine the female gender and environmental disclosure of family and non-family-controlled firms in India. Design/methodology/approach A sample size of 783 and 177 firm-year observations for family and non-family-controlled firms, respectively, between 2009 and 2020 uses descriptive statistics, a test of difference in means and panel regression with random effect assumptions for data interpretation. Findings The descriptive statistics show a significant mean difference between family-controlled firms and non-family-controlled firms in India. The first findings show that female chief executive officers (CEOs) and CEO duality have a positive and statistically significant association with environmental disclosure in a family-controlled firm but not in non-family-controlled firms in India. The second findings show that independent female directors have no significant association with environmental disclosure of family and non-family firms in India. The fourth findings with critical mass theory confirm the insignificant association of female directors on environmental disclosure of family and non-family firms in India. The results are robust to controlling firm-level variables. Practical implications Firms in the Indian context, through this study, assure stakeholders that family firms are better at improving stakeholder’s expectation of environmental accountability than non-family firms, especially where female CEOs are in charge. Originality/value This study adds the family perspective of the relationship between female CEOs and the environmental disclosure of listed firms in India. Also, female CEO duality and environmental disclosure add novelty to the research studies on gender and environmental disclosure.

Motivations and Trade-Offs for Sustainability in Family Forestry and Tourism Firms: A Cross-National Survey

“…Cultural differences likely had an effect on the choices of respondents, with the results for the Chilean sample being more significant: they preferred financial outcomes, were more likely to exceed legal compliance, favored positive environmental impacts, and selected indifferent community relations over negative relations. These finding are in line with Oware et al [55], who detected a positive and significant association with environmental disclosure in family-controlled firms in India; especially when the CEO is female. Conversely, Miroshnychenko & De Massis [56] argued that family firms engage less in pollution prevention, green supply chain management, and green product development practices than non-family firms based on a survey from 45 countries.…”

The Role of Female and Millennial Directors on the Environmental Performance of Indonesian SOEs

“…This success is motivated by the board of directors' management, who focus on and continue to carry out PT PLN's business operations based on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) aspects (Banjarnahor, 2020). This phenomenon strengthens previous research that female directors care more about environmental issues than men (Oware et al, 2022;Wu et al, 2022). As a result, their presence improves the company's environmental management quality and results in high environmental performance (Konadu et al, 2022).…”

Adapting to dynamic business environments: a comparative study of family and non-family firms operating in Western Australia

“…First, the study investigates how family and non-family firms cope with a dynamic business environment. This approach complements recent scholarly discourses contrasting both groups of entrepreneurial entities and business models (Neffe et al, 2020;Oware et al, 2021). The resulting insights could be useful for practitioners, in that alternative forms of adapting could be identified and inform business owners, managers and the broader business community (e.g.…”