2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Femtosecond laser-induced nanoporous layer for enhanced osteogenesis of titanium implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[15] While a recent study reported on the evaluation of fs laser-textured implants in vitro, their performance was compared to a smooth surface control rather than more clinically relevant, rougher surfaces. [11] This is in agreement with studies on surfaces textured with longer pulse duration lasers, which generally show that the textured surfaces outperform the smooth controls in terms of bone-implant contact. [48,49] However, when compared to rough surface controls, laser-textured implants have demonstrated either inferior performance in a rabbit model of osseointegration [50] or similar performance in a tibial model in sheep [51] and in rabbits, [52] suggesting that there is some disagreement in the performance of long pulse duration laser-textured implants.…”
Section: Biological Responsesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15] While a recent study reported on the evaluation of fs laser-textured implants in vitro, their performance was compared to a smooth surface control rather than more clinically relevant, rougher surfaces. [11] This is in agreement with studies on surfaces textured with longer pulse duration lasers, which generally show that the textured surfaces outperform the smooth controls in terms of bone-implant contact. [48,49] However, when compared to rough surface controls, laser-textured implants have demonstrated either inferior performance in a rabbit model of osseointegration [50] or similar performance in a tibial model in sheep [51] and in rabbits, [52] suggesting that there is some disagreement in the performance of long pulse duration laser-textured implants.…”
Section: Biological Responsesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…[8,9] Recently, laser-texturing has shown the capacity to direct osteoblast attachment [10] and to improve the osseointegration potential of Ti implant surfaces in comparison to polished surfaces, with the caveat that their performance in comparison to rougher, more clinically relevant surfaces, is still unknown. [11] Lasertexturing offers the capacity to easily generate a wide range of micro-and nano-scale topographical features and patterns. [12] In particular, due to its short pulse duration, femtosecond (fs)In modern oral maxillofacial surgery, long-term implant stability is intrinsically linked to the quality of osseointegration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface properties, such as wettability and elastic modulus/hardness, play vital roles in cell behavior because they influence the interaction between the cell membrane and the substrate surface. For example, Arima and Iwata reported that the WCA between 40 and 60° was beneficial for cell adhesion, and Yao et al used femtosecond laser irradiation to lower the surface stiffness and elastic modulus of Ti, and the obtained surface was more beneficial for the proliferation and osteogenesis behaviors of rBMSCs. Furthermore, Sr is an essential element for human body and 99% of Sr deposits on the bone area (36–140 mg/kg) .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The osteogenic activity expressed by cell proliferation and differentiation was shown to be improved by the femtosecond laser, the effect attributed to reduced Young's modulus and the microhardness of titanium due to an appearance of voids on the subsurface layer, which originated from cavitation during conditions of high tensile stresses and temperatures [23]. The considerable absence of torque after osseointegration was observed for the titanium alloy treated using laser techniques [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%