1993
DOI: 10.1016/0308-8146(93)90220-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fermentation characteristics and nutritive value of broiler litter ensiled with corn forage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The low concentrations of lactic acid compared with acetic acid could be attributed to the activity of heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria that tend to be dominant in silages with low WSC49 and produce, in addition to lactic acid, acetic acid, ethanol, mannitol and carbon dioxide. The low levels of lactic acid obtained compared with those reported by other workers57, 58, 61, 62 could be attributed to the type and nature (dry pods) of the ensiled material. However, the low concentrations of acids and the high pH values are not an indication that clostridial fermentation took place because no butyric acid typical of clostridial silages was detected 53…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The low concentrations of lactic acid compared with acetic acid could be attributed to the activity of heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria that tend to be dominant in silages with low WSC49 and produce, in addition to lactic acid, acetic acid, ethanol, mannitol and carbon dioxide. The low levels of lactic acid obtained compared with those reported by other workers57, 58, 61, 62 could be attributed to the type and nature (dry pods) of the ensiled material. However, the low concentrations of acids and the high pH values are not an indication that clostridial fermentation took place because no butyric acid typical of clostridial silages was detected 53…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Increasing the concentration of additives and/or extending the period of ensiling promoted the growth of more fermentative microorganisms and the production of higher quantities of fermentation acids necessary for stabilizing the silage. The growth of fermentative bacteria, especially lactic acid bacteria (LAB), depends on the availability of nitrogen57, 58 but the fact that the molasses–urea treatments produced more acids than the treatments with urea alone indicates that these microbes equally need a source of energy (ATP) for adequate multiplication and that this was provided by the fermentation of molasses to lactic acid. The drop in the concentration of acids in silages treated with 60 g kg −1 molasses, 5 g kg −1 urea on 9 g kg −1 molasses, 15 g kg −1 urea indicates that there is a threshold beyond which increases in the concentration of urea begin to play a negative role in the fermentation process, a view supported by Rasool and Gilani 59…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1983) and deep stacking (Strickler, 1977). Drying or ensiling poultry waste either alone or with green or dried roughage has been the most feasible and effective way of destroying pathogens (Chaudhry et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anaerobic digestion brings about fundamental transformation of non‐protein organic nitrogen in poultry wastes to microbial protein. The processing technique yields a by‐product which has been successfully used for animal production if utilized either alone or in combination with other feed ingredients (Harmon et al 1973; Watson 1985; Prior et al 1986; Chaudhry et al 1993; Jalil et al 2001). The present study suggests that protein generated from thermophilic anaerobic digestion of poultry wastes has good biological value and can be utilized in channel catfish diets without any deleterious effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anaerobic thermophilic digestion process converts organic materials into usable by‐products such as biogas (Safley et al 1987), single cell proteins (microbial biomass) (Stafford et al 1979), feather‐lysate (Shih 1993), and dried digester sludge in the settlement (Steinsberger et al 1987). The digestion by‐product has been successfully used for animal production if utilized either alone or in combination with other feed ingredients (Watson 1985; Prior et al 1986; Chaudhry et al 1993; Paredes et al 1994; Jalil et al 2001). Paredes et al (1994) evaluated the nutritional quality of microbial biomass from anaerobic digestion of corn processing and observed that 20% of this product can be added as a source of protein to balance feed based on soy and fishmeal for carp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%