1994
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4320(94)90061-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertility of long-term-stored boar semen: Influence of extender (Androhep and Kiev), storage time and plasma droplets in the semen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
84
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
8
84
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as shown by our trials, some extenders can demonstrate better performance also in the short term. When the use of semen doses is postponed (more than 3 to 4 days), in our opinion, it is necessary to use a long-term extender, which is more expensive but which can offer about a greater guarantee regarding semen longevity as confirmed by field trials (Johnson et al, 1988;Waberski et al, 1994). SFM could be a good choice because, as a homemade diluent, it is not so expensive but requires accuracy in preparation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as shown by our trials, some extenders can demonstrate better performance also in the short term. When the use of semen doses is postponed (more than 3 to 4 days), in our opinion, it is necessary to use a long-term extender, which is more expensive but which can offer about a greater guarantee regarding semen longevity as confirmed by field trials (Johnson et al, 1988;Waberski et al, 1994). SFM could be a good choice because, as a homemade diluent, it is not so expensive but requires accuracy in preparation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A negative effect of infertile bull spermatozoa with retained CDs on normal bull spermatozoa was shown during bovine fertilization in vitro (Thundathil et al 2001). In boars, the proportion of spermatozoa with distal CDs in an ejaculate had a negative correlation with pregnancy rates and litter size (Waberski et al 1994). The accumulation of rejected CDs in semen could affect fertility directly by reducing sperm motility, or indirectly by releasing active enzymes and reactive oxygen species into seminal plasma (Aitken & Clarkson 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this species, shed CDs accumulate in the ejaculate in the form of cellular debris. The presence of CDs either on the sperm midpiece (Waberski et al 1994, Thundathil et al 2001 or detached in the ejaculate (Aitken & Clarkson 1988) could reduce the fertilizing ability of the ejaculated boar spermatozoa. While the CDs retained on the sperm midpiece can be accounted for using conventional light-microscopical semen analysis, it is difficult to quantify the amount of free, detached CDs in boar semen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some may be caused by unsuitable rearing conditions. Some authors of the papers published in this field consider the level of AS occurrence to be an important marker for the semen quality besides the sperm motility (Leidl et al, 1971;Lyczynski and Pawlak, 1974;Blom and Andersen, 1975;Gamčík et al, 1976;Blom, 1977;Stemmler et al, 1982;Wekerle, 1982;Falkenberg et al, 1984;Yoshida and Kojima, 1989;Waberski et al, 1990Waberski et al, , 1994Itoh and Toyama, 1995;Itoh et al, 1996;Věžník et al, 2000;Louda et al, 2001;Corcuera et al, 2002;Gadea, 2002). According to Waberski et al (1990) two criteria are sufficient for the selection of boars for insemination or ejaculate: sperm motility and percentage of AS, especially when the semen is preserved and used for the insemination of sows after a longer time, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%