2009
DOI: 10.1080/00927870701353662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiber Cone of Codimension 2 Lattice Ideals

Abstract: x 1 x 2 x r be a codimension two lattice ideal. In this article we study the arithmetic properties of the blow-up of the ideal I in . Let I = n≥0 I n / I n be the Fiber cone of I, we prove thatIn addition, if is infinite and I is radical, noncomplete intersection, then:• I has dimension 3, is reduced, arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay, of minimal degree. Moreover, a presentation of I is effective from the minimal system of generators of I. • An explicit minimal reduction of I is given. • The blow-up ring, or Rees … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A particular class of varieties, of important interest in classical Geometry are Cohen-Macaulay varieties of minimal degree, they were classified geometrically by the successive contribution of Del Pezzo (1885) [DP], Bertini (1907) [B], and Xambo (1981) [X] and algebraically in Barile and Morales (2000) [BM2]. They appear naturally studying the fiber cone of a codimension two toric ideals Morales (1995) [M], Gimenez et al (1993Gimenez et al ( , 1999 [GMS1,GMS2], Barile and Morales (1998) [BM1], Ha (2006) [H], Ha and Morales (2009) [HM].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular class of varieties, of important interest in classical Geometry are Cohen-Macaulay varieties of minimal degree, they were classified geometrically by the successive contribution of Del Pezzo (1885) [DP], Bertini (1907) [B], and Xambo (1981) [X] and algebraically in Barile and Morales (2000) [BM2]. They appear naturally studying the fiber cone of a codimension two toric ideals Morales (1995) [M], Gimenez et al (1993Gimenez et al ( , 1999 [GMS1,GMS2], Barile and Morales (1998) [BM1], Ha (2006) [H], Ha and Morales (2009) [HM].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%