2006
DOI: 10.1117/3.665802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Guide to Optical Lithography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…L min = 25 nm, J = 20, d = 0.25 nm, and a = 1.9 nm (i.e. 5% of the minimum CD [19]) are used for investigating the performance of the two correction strategies on the first metal layer of a large standard logic cell (i.e. the MUX4X1 cell with an area of 3.344 Â 1.444 lm 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L min = 25 nm, J = 20, d = 0.25 nm, and a = 1.9 nm (i.e. 5% of the minimum CD [19]) are used for investigating the performance of the two correction strategies on the first metal layer of a large standard logic cell (i.e. the MUX4X1 cell with an area of 3.344 Â 1.444 lm 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These projection systems consist of complex lens combinations, but they typically adhere to a so-called Kohler setup, shown in Fig. 2 where the pupil (the element constraining the numerical aperture of the system) of the entire lens system is located in the fourier plane of the mask image Mack (2006); Levinson (2001). This allows us to make abstraction of the lens system and the source and approximate the entire projection process using Fourier optics Kintner (1978).…”
Section: Optical Projection Lithography Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The industry is currently stuck with the 193nm optical lithography as the dominant integrated circuit manufacturing process, which is likely to remain so for at least another 5 years. Therefore, it is expected to use 193nm optical lithography for 32nm or even 22nm technology nodes, with the adoption of immersion lithography [3] and advanced resolution enhancement techniques (RET) [4]- [6]. There are other important manufacturing/process challenges, such as topography variations due to chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP), random defects due to missing/extra material, via void/failure, etc., all resulting in additional yield loss (including functional and parametric losses).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%