2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field scale functional agrobiodiversity in organic wheat: Effects on weed reduction, disease susceptibility and yield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of weed species and weed density varied during the growth period of all three crops (winter wheat, common vetch and maize) and similar trends were also observed in almost all the treatments (T, NT, TS and NTS) within a crop. The similarity in the changes in weeds among the treatments is largely attributed to traits shared among the weeds, since weed growth is closely associated with the crop (Liebman and Dyck, 1993;Lemerle et al, 2001;Teasdale et al, 2004;Melander et al, 2005;Ryan et al, 2008;Andrew et al, 2015;Costanzo and Bàrberi, 2016). We also found minor treatment effects.…”
Section: Effect Of Crop Growth Stage On Weed Species Number and Weed supporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of weed species and weed density varied during the growth period of all three crops (winter wheat, common vetch and maize) and similar trends were also observed in almost all the treatments (T, NT, TS and NTS) within a crop. The similarity in the changes in weeds among the treatments is largely attributed to traits shared among the weeds, since weed growth is closely associated with the crop (Liebman and Dyck, 1993;Lemerle et al, 2001;Teasdale et al, 2004;Melander et al, 2005;Ryan et al, 2008;Andrew et al, 2015;Costanzo and Bàrberi, 2016). We also found minor treatment effects.…”
Section: Effect Of Crop Growth Stage On Weed Species Number and Weed supporting
confidence: 57%
“…But, in general, the effectiveness of stubbles on weed control is largely dependent on the density of stubbles (Moore et al, 1994;Reberg-Horton et al, 2012). The practice of crop rotation has traditionally been used in agriculture, as it affects weeds (Melander et al, 2005;Ryan et al, 2008) and weed seedbanks under conventional tillage (Cardina et al, 2002) that respond to specific crops and associated management practices (Liebman and Dyck, 1993;Lemerle et al, 2001;Teasdale et al, 2004;Melander et al, 2005;Ryan et al, 2008;Andrew et al, 2015;Costanzo and Bàrberi, 2016). The adoption of rotations in conjunction with conservation practices, such as reduced tillage and stubble retention, might increase the species diversity of weeds across the rotation (Kegode et al, 1999;Murphy et al, 2006;Nord et al, 2011) and reduce the abundance of weeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This deviates from a number of studies that have reported reduced fungal disease severity with the use of green manures and living mulches; e.g. Costanzo and Barberi (2016) reported that the presence of legume living mulch reduced the severity of the wheat leaf spot complex by 37% in average, and Kosinski et al (2011) found that kura clover living mulch significantly reduced the development of barley leaf diseases. In a previous Norwegian study, the frequencies of net blotch infected barley seedlings were significantly reduced after soil amendments of grass and clover in a greenhouse experiment using two heavily infected seed lots (Brodal et al 2008).…”
Section: Strategycontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Increased plant biomass density in the field is the key to increasing agricultural sustainability, while producing high yields. (i) More standing biomass (and less bare soil) through increased crop density (Weiner et al 2010), intercropping (Vandermeer 1989) or subsidiary crops [cover crops (Wittwer et al 2017) and 'living mulches' (Hartwig & Ammon 2002;Costanzo & B arberi 2016)]. Competition among plants in the field should be seen as something to manipulate, not something to avoid.…”
Section: The Importance Of Improving Soil Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), intercropping (Vandermeer ) or subsidiary crops [cover crops (Wittwer et al . ) and ‘living mulches’ (Hartwig & Ammon ; Costanzo & Bàrberi )]. Competition among plants in the field should be seen as something to manipulate, not something to avoid.…”
Section: The Importance Of Improving Soil Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%