2014
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/9/07/t07003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field stabilization studies for a radio frequency quadrupole accelerator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For BISOL RFQ, the nearest mode to operating mode is TE 111 , the corresponding mode separation is only 0.5 MHz. In general, the typical methods for increasing the mode separation are π-mode stabilizing loops (PSLs) and dipole-mode stabilization rods (DSRs) [8,9,[25][26][27][28], as shown in figure 24. Figure 25 shows the sensitivity of the mode separation to the variations of PSLs distance and DIPs length.…”
Section: Mode Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For BISOL RFQ, the nearest mode to operating mode is TE 111 , the corresponding mode separation is only 0.5 MHz. In general, the typical methods for increasing the mode separation are π-mode stabilizing loops (PSLs) and dipole-mode stabilization rods (DSRs) [8,9,[25][26][27][28], as shown in figure 24. Figure 25 shows the sensitivity of the mode separation to the variations of PSLs distance and DIPs length.…”
Section: Mode Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quadrupole and dipole mode frequencies can be very close in a four-vane RFQ as the length of the structure increases, which introduces the possibility of accidental degeneracy between the operating quadrupole mode and the dipole family [9]. Enhanced dipole-to-quadrupole mode separation can make the RFQ less sensitive to dimensional construction errors and strengthen its field stabilization [24]. Various methods have been devised to increase the mode separation, including vane coupling rings [25], dipole separation rods (DSR) [26,27], π-mode stabilizer loops (PISL) [28,29] and asymmetric four-vane RFQ [30].…”
Section: Double-dipole Four-vane Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the faces of the covered profiles were joined using loft operation in CST modeler in order to model the vane in the RMS and FFS sections. Various parameters need to be optimized for the design of cutbacks [24]. Here, b is the radius of the beam hole at the end-plate, t is the thickness of the end-plate, g is the gap between the vane and the end-plate, d is the undercut depth up to which the vane is removed, h 2 and h 3 are the heights of the vane at the starting and the end of the undercut respectively, and h 1 is the full height of the RFQ vane from the beam axis.…”
Section: Vane-end Cutback Designmentioning
confidence: 99%