“…Second, an increasing body of literature highlights the role of the affective domain in the process of negotiation, showcasing how feelings, intuition, imagination, values, relationality, and desires to identify with what is being studied shape the stories students tell about the past and the ways they interpret it (Colby, 2008;Rudolph & Wright, 2015). A third area of scholarship, though relatively marginal, brings to light the ways in which students' engage in the process of attributing significance to some stories over others (Barton, 2005;Chinnery, 2010;Kansteiner, 2017;Levstik, 2000;Simon, 2004), especially when it comes to attending to the difficult and serious facts, traces, images and testimonies, or trauma narratives that "demand a reckoning" (Simon, 2004, p. 186) because they "wound" or "haunt" us today (p. 190), thereby participating in a public practice of remembrance as a form of "ethical learning" (p. 187). These three areas within the discussion on narrative as a habit of mind to interpret the past help reduce the importance of cognitive psychological factors in narrative meaning construction.…”