1994
DOI: 10.1002/sia.740210107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Film thickness measurements of SiO2 by XPS

Abstract: The preferred XPS methodology for measurement of SiOz film thickness on polished silicon surfaces is discussed. A precise measurement of the photoelectron attenuation length was made using nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) to calibrate the film thicknesses. Anodic oxide films on Si, which are very reproducible in thickness, are used as test samples. Appropriate corrections fur the problem of adventitious carbon are shown. Under some conditions, the phenomenon of photoelectron difliaction has a significant effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
69
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…n is the density of Si atoms in the corresponding layer, s is the photoionization cross section, l SiO x N y and l Si are the attenuation lengths of the photoelectrons in the overlayer and underlayer respectively, d is the thickness of the overlayer, and Q is the take-off angle [1][2][3]6,9]. The validity of this approach was established; firstly by comparing the thickness of two SiO 2 /Si samples obtained by this method against the thickness obtained by Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS), and ellipsometry [6], and secondly by comparing the thickness obtained by XPS against the thickness obtained by Nuclear Reaction Analysis [2].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…n is the density of Si atoms in the corresponding layer, s is the photoionization cross section, l SiO x N y and l Si are the attenuation lengths of the photoelectrons in the overlayer and underlayer respectively, d is the thickness of the overlayer, and Q is the take-off angle [1][2][3]6,9]. The validity of this approach was established; firstly by comparing the thickness of two SiO 2 /Si samples obtained by this method against the thickness obtained by Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS), and ellipsometry [6], and secondly by comparing the thickness obtained by XPS against the thickness obtained by Nuclear Reaction Analysis [2].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of this approach was established; firstly by comparing the thickness of two SiO 2 /Si samples obtained by this method against the thickness obtained by Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS), and ellipsometry [6], and secondly by comparing the thickness obtained by XPS against the thickness obtained by Nuclear Reaction Analysis [2]. The molar volume of Si is 12.056 cm 3 and the molar volume of SiO x N y is approximated as 23.5 cm 3 , from the molar volume of SiO 2 , which has a wide range from 20 to 27 cm 3 depending on the crystal structure [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some components of the total current can easily be controlled by application of a small (0-10 V) external voltage bias, both in the form of d.c. and/or a.c. pulses, as it has been reported recently [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. The effect of this applied voltage-bias can then be assessed in the measured line positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thickness of the overlayer was estimated from the angular dependency of the XPS data. 38 A Kratos ES300 electron spectrometer with MgKR X-rays (nonmonochromatic) was used for XPS measurements. In the standard geometry, the sample accepts X-rays at 45°and ejects photoelectrons at 90°with respect to the surface plane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%