2011
DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjq006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial Contracting Under Imperfect Enforcement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 10 A standard argument, similar to the proof of Lemma 1 in Ellingsen and Kristiansen (2011), implies that any contract that violates the retention constraint in some relevant state is suboptimal; there is another contract that yields higher expected pro…t for the …rm.…”
Section: Analyzing the Basic Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…10 10 A standard argument, similar to the proof of Lemma 1 in Ellingsen and Kristiansen (2011), implies that any contract that violates the retention constraint in some relevant state is suboptimal; there is another contract that yields higher expected pro…t for the …rm.…”
Section: Analyzing the Basic Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Let the …nancial market's required rate of return be normalized to 0. To capture frictions in the …nancial market, we assume that …nancial contracts be imperfectly enforced, applying a simple version of the model of Ellingsen and Kristiansen (2011): An entrepreneur who diverts resources is apprehended with probability ' < 1. With probability 1 ' the diversion attempt succeeds and the entrepreneur can enjoy the illegally diverted revenues.…”
Section: The Outside Opportunitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Meh and Moran (2010) or Gertler and Kiyotaki (2010). A notable extension is Ellingsen and Kristiansen (2011) who develop a static banking model with inside equity, outside equity and deposits. the benefit from retaining the non-pledgeable part of the investment.…”
Section: Bankersmentioning
confidence: 99%