2008
DOI: 10.1177/1368430207084845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finding Teammates Who Are Not Prone to Sucker and Free-Rider Effects: The Protestant Work Ethic as a Moderator of Motivation Losses in Group Performance

Abstract: This study examined whether differences in the endorsement of the 'Protestant Work Ethic' (PWE) are related to motivation losses in group work. Three factors were derived from male student scores on the Mirels-Garrett Protestant Work Ethic Scale, Ho's Australian Work Ethic Scale and a scale designed to assess preferences for reward distributions: instrumental value of work, ethical value of work and normative value of equity. The study assessed motivation loss in two situations; one designed to promote free-ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result corroborates the notion that justice norms come into play in team tasks that constitute social dilemmas. In addition, the result also constitutes a validation of the equity sensitivity measure by Abele and Diehl (2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result corroborates the notion that justice norms come into play in team tasks that constitute social dilemmas. In addition, the result also constitutes a validation of the equity sensitivity measure by Abele and Diehl (2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In Abele and Diehl's (2008) study, for example, social categories or group affiliations were not mentioned. In Kerr's (1983) study, participants did not even see their alleged partner.…”
Section: Some Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, evidence suggests that links exist between work ethic and attitudes toward unemployment (Furnham, 1982) and attitudes toward the poor (Cozzarelli et al, 2001). Research indicates that work ethic influences motivation loss in group performance (Abele and Diehl, 2008), intrinsic motivation among students (Tang, 1989), intergroup and policy attitudes (Rosenthal et al, 2011), and is associated with great personal responsibility and expected success (Christopher and Schlenker, 2005). These are a few of the diverse studies involving work ethic, but perhaps the most common evaluations of work ethic tend to be across groups.…”
Section: Work Ethicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many researches carried out on group works (Gibbs, 2009;Bentley and Warwick, 2013) covering various aspects. Some of the studies look into the potential benefits, while others study pitfalls associated with it (Burke, 2011) such as social loafing (Harkins, et al, 1980;Williams et al, 1981;Brook sand Ammons, 2003;Piezon and Donaldson, 2005), free riding (Gibbs, 2009;Mc Ardle et al, 2005;Kerr and Bruun, 1983) and sucker effects (Kerr, 1983;Robbins, 1995;Abele and Diehl, 2008). Few researches are also available analysing the student perception (Garvin et al, 1995;Knight, 2004;Amato and Amato, 2005;So and Brush, 2008;Bentley and Warwick, 2013) of group assignment based on different criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%