2014 IEEE International Conference on IC Design &Amp; Technology 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icicdt.2014.6838606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FinFET SRAM design challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The never-ending demand for packing more functionality per area and the requirement of higher performance from processing units leads to continuous scaling of devices. 46 This scaling trickles down to smaller bitcells and enables an increase in memory array density in terms of number of bits stored per area. Hence from the density point of view, minimum sized transistors are desired in bitcells.…”
Section: Sram Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The never-ending demand for packing more functionality per area and the requirement of higher performance from processing units leads to continuous scaling of devices. 46 This scaling trickles down to smaller bitcells and enables an increase in memory array density in terms of number of bits stored per area. Hence from the density point of view, minimum sized transistors are desired in bitcells.…”
Section: Sram Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1:1:1 bitcell provides highest array density but it suffers from flaws in terms of lower read stability and writability. 46,47 The constant need for voltage scaling to lower power further exacerbates SRAM readability and writability issues. This calls for alternate bitcells like the Low Voltage (LV) 1:1:2 cell and High Performance (HP) 1:2:2 cell 46 along with read and write assist techniques to improve SRAM metrics.…”
Section: Sram Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar review was also carried out by Bhattacharya and Jha [16]. Discussion on design challenges on FinFET was carried out by Burnett et al [17]. The most recent study of Zhang et al [18] [19] have emphasized on low powered applications with FinFET technologies of 7/8 nm.…”
Section: Existing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, each model has its configuration with a different distribution of fins in the cell's transistors. The SRAM cell structure is divided into three parts with their proper notation (PU:PG:PD), meaning respectively: Pull Up, Pass Gate and Pull Down [15]. As an example, the HD configuration adopts a (1:1:1) configuration, meaning that all the cell transistors are composed of a single fin.…”
Section: A Sram Cell Modeling In Tcadmentioning
confidence: 99%