2009
DOI: 10.1002/ima.20193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finger vein recognition using minutia‐based alignment and local binary pattern‐based feature extraction

Abstract: With recent increases in security requirements, biometrics such as fingerprints, faces, and irises have been widely used in many recognition applications including door access control, personal authentication for computers, Internet banking, automatic teller machines, and border-crossing controls. Finger vein recognition uses the unique patterns of finger veins to identify individuals at a high level of accuracy. This article proposes a new finger vein recognition method using minutia-based alignment and local… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
131
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
131
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As show in the table, taking into consideration of matching accuracy and information entropy, k is selected as 60, and the best EER=0.512%. To verify the validity of the proposed method, in this experiment, state-of-the-art methods for finger vein recognition such as LBP [6], (2D) 2 FPCA [12], BLPOC [7], Gabor [4], HOG [8]and HOL [11]are implemented for comparison. Table 2 shows the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves derived from the above methods.…”
Section: Advances In Intelligent Systems Research Volume 146mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As show in the table, taking into consideration of matching accuracy and information entropy, k is selected as 60, and the best EER=0.512%. To verify the validity of the proposed method, in this experiment, state-of-the-art methods for finger vein recognition such as LBP [6], (2D) 2 FPCA [12], BLPOC [7], Gabor [4], HOG [8]and HOL [11]are implemented for comparison. Table 2 shows the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves derived from the above methods.…”
Section: Advances In Intelligent Systems Research Volume 146mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many efforts are contributed to develop this technology and the technology has made remarkable progress with these efforts in the resent two decades. The representative methods include repeated line tracking by Miura [3], various feature extraction methods based on Gabor filter [4,5], local binary pattern (LBP)method based on local information [6], band-limited phase only correlation filter (BLPOC) [7], histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) descriptor [8], and various subspace learning methods, etc. These methods investigate various feature description for finger vein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16. Lee et al implemented finger-vein feature extraction based on minutia-based alignment and LBP [19]. Information about direction is the major feature of a finger vein.…”
Section: Lbp Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Driven by the fact that the subject-specified hand-vein information could be well represented by the four models, is that possible to obtain effective gender-specified representation so that accurate gender classification result would be generated with similar methods? Four representative methods involving mean curvature [3], (2D)2PCA [4], LBP [5], SIFT [6], which corresponds to the four identity recognition groups, are made attempt with the lab-made database to figure out answer to our puzzle, extremely low classification accuracy as shown in Table 1 fication and recognition task [7], [8], an unsupervised sparse feature learning model (USFL) to learn the statistical representation of specific vein information only differing in gender is proposed in this letter. The new feature learning model is easy to implement and free of complicated hyperparameter tuning (only the number of features to learn is tunable) when compared with the restricted Boltzmann machines (RBM) [9], denoising autoencoders [10] and sparse coding [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%