1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9270(99)00569-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fingerstick Helicobacter pylori antibody test: better than laboratory serological testing?

Abstract: New generation in-office, whole-blood antibody tests that can achieve a sensitivity and specificity similar to or better than those of widely used quantitative laboratory serological tests may be used as the initial screening tests of choice for H. pylori.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several previous studies have evaluated other rapid whole blood test kits for H. pylori antibody detection, reporting sensitivities and specificities of 80.3–89.5 % and 78.0–93.5 %, and PPVs and NPVs of 83–92.9 % and 57.4–93.5 %, respectively [ 13 , 17 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous studies have evaluated other rapid whole blood test kits for H. pylori antibody detection, reporting sensitivities and specificities of 80.3–89.5 % and 78.0–93.5 %, and PPVs and NPVs of 83–92.9 % and 57.4–93.5 %, respectively [ 13 , 17 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the accuracy of first-generation tests was lower than other diagnostic tests [12] some of the recent studies of whole blood near patient tests show encouraging resultsm [16 -23] with sensitivity from 58 % to 95 % and specificity from 85 % to 98 % depending from the used test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole blood immunoassays for the detection of H pylori are presently being promoted for use in primary care. Whole blood fingerstick antibody tests are simple, in-office tests providing rapid results but the accuracy of first-generation tests was lower than other diagnostic tests [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a next-generation in-office, whole-blood antibody test that can achieve a sensitivity and specificity similar to or better than those of widely used quantitative laboratory serological tests and may be used as the initial screening tests of choice for H. pylori (Laine, et al 1999). However, its results are very poor and cannot be equated with ELISA serology (Hunt, et al 2010).…”
Section: Finger-stick Serology Testmentioning
confidence: 99%