2012
DOI: 10.1002/pamm.201210190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element methods for problems with solid‐liquid‐solid phase transitions and free melt surface

Abstract: Modeling and computation of a process with solid‐liquid‐solid phase transitions and a free capillary surface is discussed. The main components of the model are heat conduction, a free melt surface, a moving phase boundary, and its coupling with the Navier‐Stokes equations. We present two different approaches for handling the phase transitions by applying in a FE method, namely an energy conservation based approach, and a sharp interface approach with moving mesh. By combining both methods, we benefit from the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forward problem with given boundary conditions is discretized by a finite element method which combines a Stefan problem solver with a free-surface Navier-Stokes solver. The latter is based on the Navier code [1], the combined approach is described in more detail in [2,7]. Locally refined (triangular or tetrahedral) meshes are needed in order to approximate the large variations in temperature near the heating zone and the surrounding of the solid-liquid interface sufficiently well, while keeping the overall numerical costs acceptable.…”
Section: Numerical Discretization Of the Forward Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forward problem with given boundary conditions is discretized by a finite element method which combines a Stefan problem solver with a free-surface Navier-Stokes solver. The latter is based on the Navier code [1], the combined approach is described in more detail in [2,7]. Locally refined (triangular or tetrahedral) meshes are needed in order to approximate the large variations in temperature near the heating zone and the surrounding of the solid-liquid interface sufficiently well, while keeping the overall numerical costs acceptable.…”
Section: Numerical Discretization Of the Forward Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a welding process, contact angles ω {1,2} are prescribed additionally and a non-melting material Ω S with a non-slip boundary Γ P is introduced. For handling the solid-liquid interface Γ S , an approach based on energy conservation and a sharp interface method are combined, as discussed in [1,3]. To avoid the numerical effort of a complete 3D simulation of the processes, the considered geometry is reduced to a 2D rotational symmetric geometry for a material accumulation process or a 2D cross-section model for a welding process, where the cross-section is taken perpendicular to direction of the heat source movement.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, a model presented in [1,2] is used to simulate a material accumulation process and a welding process basing on the numerical approaches presented in [2,3]. For a welding process simulation in a cross-section, a heat source is modeled to approximate heat fluxes in welding direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These relations lead to the conclusion that for any combination of preform diameter and shaft size a particularly precise process window for forming at different temperatures has to be identified. In order to achieve most fitting results, a mathematical model has been implemented [10].…”
Section: Wgp Congress 2013mentioning
confidence: 99%