2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.96.125426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-size effects in a nanowire strongly coupled to a thin superconducting shell

Abstract: We study the proximity effect in a one-dimensional nanowire strongly coupled to a finite superconductor with a characteristic size which is much shorter than its coherence length. Such geometries have become increasingly relevant in recent years in the experimental search for Majorana fermions with the development of thin epitaxial Al shells which form a very strong contact with either InAs or InSb nanowires. So far, however, no theoretical treatment of the proximity effect in these systems has accounted for t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(139 reference statements)
9
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results in the absence of disorder are in qualitative agreement with Ref. [18], which studies a onedimensional wire coupled to a thin superconductor. In Ref.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results in the absence of disorder are in qualitative agreement with Ref. [18], which studies a onedimensional wire coupled to a thin superconductor. In Ref.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In Ref. 18, the coupling to the superconductor is described by a tunneling energy scale γ; our present approach features a continuum model, for which the coupling is described by the interface transmission probability |t ⊥ | 2 at perpendicular incidence. For weak coupling the two quantities are related by γ ∼ |t ⊥ | 2 v N /D N , and we find that our prediction for the suppression of the induced gap in Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, we use L x = 520a, L NW = 1000a, and keep the N-junction 2a long, to reach realistic sizes with the outer ends of the NWs well within the SCs. The width of the SC, L y , is varied in order to tune the influence of the SC on the NW [39][40][41][42]. We have verified that our results remain qualitatively unchanged for ∆ sc and Γ both being smaller (or even larger), as well as when ∆ sc (i) is calculated self-consistently [50][51][52][53][54].…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…The two levels of the MBS qubit are |L = f † L |0 TNW and |R = f † R |0 TNW , with |0 TNW being the vacuum state of the TNW. We assume that the ST 0 qubit is coherently coupled to the MBS qubit and decoupled from states above the gap | 0 ± E Z j /2| ∆, with ∆ being the proximity induced gap of the topological superconductor, which should be close to the superconducting gap of the parent s-wave superconductor in the strong coupling regime [92][93][94][95][96][97][98] . Also we assume that the DQD has a well defined number of confined charge carriers -that it is protected from leakage to states with a different number of electrons in the DQD, t j /| 0 ± E Z j /2| 1.…”
Section: The Effective Qubit Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%