2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.99.045108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-temperature auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo: Self-consistent constraint and systematic approach to low temperatures

Abstract: We describe an approach for many-body calculations with a finite-temperature, grand canonical ensemble formalism using auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) with a self-consistent constraint to control the sign problem. The usual AFQMC formalism of Blankenbecler, Scalapino, and Sugar suffers from the sign problem with most physical Hamiltonians, as is well known. Building on earlier ideas to constrain the paths in auxiliary-field space [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2777(1999] and incorporating recent development… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we choose ∆τ t = 0.02 which has been tested to safely reach the ∆τ → 0 limit. In this work, we have also implemented our most recent improvements [71,72] of the dQMC algorithm. For the computation of dynamical quantities, we first measure the imaginary-time correlation functions, and then obtain the imaginary-frequency observables via Fourier transformation.…”
Section: B Determinant Quantum Monte Carlomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we choose ∆τ t = 0.02 which has been tested to safely reach the ∆τ → 0 limit. In this work, we have also implemented our most recent improvements [71,72] of the dQMC algorithm. For the computation of dynamical quantities, we first measure the imaginary-time correlation functions, and then obtain the imaginary-frequency observables via Fourier transformation.…”
Section: B Determinant Quantum Monte Carlomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In classical MC simulations, for example, moves that modify the particle number can be useful for reducing decorrelation times or for studying coexistence between phases. [1][2][3][4][5] Similarly, the starting point of many [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] (but not all [13][14][15][16] ) finite temperature quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) simulations is the grand canonical partition function Z = Tr exp[−β(H + µN )], where β is the inverse temperature, H is the Hamiltonian, and N is the number operator. The trace above runs over all quantum wavefunctions, not just those constrained to a fixed particle number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45][46][47] In addition, the bias introduced by the phaseless approximation is typically much smaller than the fixed node-error in DMC 48 which in principle should serve as an rough upper bound to the bias in RPIMC. Thus, it is important to assess the quality of ph-FT-AFQMC for realistic systems as to date the applications have largely focussed on model systems 49,50 or have not enforced the constraint [51][52][53] which is not a practical approach as the system size increases. Compared to FT-CCSD, ph-FT-AFQMC maintains favorable cubic scaling O(M 3 ) for each statistical sample, 54,55 which makes it better-suited for large-scale warm dense matter simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%