2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40999-018-0332-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire Structural Response of the Plasco Building: A Preliminary Investigation Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This building had originally been designed as light commercial center in Tehran, but later larger live loads had been imposed to the building. In this regard, Behnam analyzed the Plasco building and showed that stress ratio of members under the increased gravity load were higher than 0.8. In the present study, the maximum stress ratio of columns under original gravity load ratio is about 0.36.…”
Section: Analyses and Results For The Regular Frame In Firementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This building had originally been designed as light commercial center in Tehran, but later larger live loads had been imposed to the building. In this regard, Behnam analyzed the Plasco building and showed that stress ratio of members under the increased gravity load were higher than 0.8. In the present study, the maximum stress ratio of columns under original gravity load ratio is about 0.36.…”
Section: Analyses and Results For The Regular Frame In Firementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the WTC buildings, high levels of temperature inhomogeneity in the large compartments with such developing/spreading fire features have been reported on many other occasions: the First Interstate Bank Building in Los Angeles in 1988, 5 the Windsor Tower in Madrid in 2005, 6 and more recently the Plasco Building in Tehran in 2017. 7,8 Furthermore, experimental evidence from dedicated tests has also shown a high degree of temperature heterogeneity in such compartments and the corresponding threat to the structures, with relevant experiments reviewed by Stern-Gottfried and Rein in 2012, 9 and Dai et al in 2017. 10 These facts underline the urgent need for a better description of fire scenarios for structural design, recognizing the trend towards the larger spatial layouts often preferred in contemporary architecture.…”
Section: Why Travelling Firesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It suggests that smaller opening widths would yield higher steel temperatures and longer heating durations. The reason is probably that reducing the opening width will confine more upper smoke layer mass and energy within the compartment, that is, less mass and energy from the hot upper layer is lost through the openings, as suggested by Equations (6) and (7). When the travelling fire scenarios have relatively small opening widths, that is, 1.5, 2, and 3.5 m, their maximum temperatures seem to coincide to an upper limit, at approximately 1106 C. The small opening sizes may constrain the ambient air inflow through the compartment cold layer, with _ m a ð Þ max = 0:52A v ffiffiffiffiffi ffi H v p (Section 2.2) for ventilation-controlled burning, while oxygen is limited.…”
Section: Further Parametric Studies On Using Etfm Framework For Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electric current that is caused by the lighting strike heats up the structure so that it can start fires [38]. Besides, fire alone can also be the main factor that leads to structural failure [39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%