1980
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1980.tb04756.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fireblight Erwinia amylovora and weather: a comparison of warning systems

Abstract: SUMMARY Warning systems for fireblight Erwinia amylovora developed in New York, Illinois and California, USA, and in south‐east England are compared. General principles which might be applicable in the different climates were sought. The consequences of applying threshold temperature values chosen for one area in a different climatic area were examined using Sacramento, California; Rochester, New York; Vlissingen, The Netherlands; Kent, England as examples. A graded system for assessing fireblight risks, deriv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Fire blight is distributed in the temperate climate zones where temperatures of 15 to 20°C are accompanied by high relative humidity, which favors infection of a host plant by E. amylovora (3,8,9,48). During screening for temperature-dependent gene expression in this pathogen, a gene was identified which presumably encodes a multidrug efflux transporter (14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fire blight is distributed in the temperate climate zones where temperatures of 15 to 20°C are accompanied by high relative humidity, which favors infection of a host plant by E. amylovora (3,8,9,48). During screening for temperature-dependent gene expression in this pathogen, a gene was identified which presumably encodes a multidrug efflux transporter (14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more rigorous approach was therefore attempted using existing predictive models available in the literature, mainly that of Billing (1980a). However this would not take into account the detailed biology of the disease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf rust development is a function of temperature fluctuation, hourly leaf wetness, relative humidity and wind movement when sufficient amount of virulent, initial inoculum are deposited on a susceptible wheat variety. Disease forecasts utilizing environmental conditions and indirect assessment if initial inoculum have been reported (Billing, 1974(Billing, , 1980Castor et al, 1975;Stevens, 1934;Thomson et al, 1982). Urediniospore inoculum effects on leaf rust development have been described in quantitative terms (Burleigh et al, 1969;Dirks and Romig, 1970;Subba Rao et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%