2022
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5c0c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fires that matter: reconceptualizing fire risk to include interactions between humans and the natural environment

Abstract: Increasing fire impacts across North America are associated with climate and vegetation change, greater exposure through development expansion, and less-well studied but salient social vulnerabilities. We are at a critical moment in the contemporary human-fire relationship, with an urgent need to transition from emergency response to proactive measures that build sustainable communities, protect human health, and restore the use of fire necessary for maintaining the health of ecosystems. We propose an integrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More broadly across the West, our results imply that the emergence of fire-regime shifts will be marked by exceptional fire years in individual landscapes and regions, as seen in the Southern Rockies, which may result in a 'ratchet of events' driving ecosystem changes across space and time [84,85]. Furthermore, while climateenabled extreme fire events may have historical precedents, wildfire risk from unintentional ignitionsas well as exposure of communities in the wildlandurban interface-far exceed historical conditions [13]. Planning for community response and resource management would benefit from increasingly anticipating extreme events and the risks they pose to human health, infrastructure, and ecosystem services at regional scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More broadly across the West, our results imply that the emergence of fire-regime shifts will be marked by exceptional fire years in individual landscapes and regions, as seen in the Southern Rockies, which may result in a 'ratchet of events' driving ecosystem changes across space and time [84,85]. Furthermore, while climateenabled extreme fire events may have historical precedents, wildfire risk from unintentional ignitionsas well as exposure of communities in the wildlandurban interface-far exceed historical conditions [13]. Planning for community response and resource management would benefit from increasingly anticipating extreme events and the risks they pose to human health, infrastructure, and ecosystem services at regional scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Increased fire activity in high-elevation forests across the western US has been especially pronounced, as widespread burning in these forests is typically limited by high fuel moisture and short fire seasons [10]. Higher fire activity in turn has wide-ranging impacts on species turnover, water resources, and human communities [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human activity affects fire in different ways, through direct ignitions or fire suppression (Fig. 2, direct arrow to stressors) or indirectly by altering environmental factors, for example by managing fuel load or by altering landscape properties 59,82 . At longer timescales, species selection and management practices influence forest composition, structure and biodiversity, and thus resistance and resilience to extremes 52 .…”
Section: Internal Ecosystem Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local informal networks are key to achieving behavioural change in land use and wildfire management and to create legitimacy in wildfire governance aiming to overcome the policy practice gap (Carmenta et al 2017, Iglesias et al 2022, Platt et al 2022. There is much evidence on the importance of local stakeholders organizing via formal and informal networks (e.g., neighborhood, landowner, or industrial associations) to make decisions on wildfire management.…”
Section: Actor Participation In Decision-making and Decision Takingmentioning
confidence: 99%