2017
DOI: 10.12980/apjtd.7.2017d7-89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First detection on prevalence of Anaplasma marginale in sheep and goat in Karak District, Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which is similar to previous findings in Mardan District, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan with 23.33% using cELISA [37]. However, the prevalence we estimated was slightly lower than those previously reported by Hussein et al [22] (56.25%) and by Shah et al [54] (40.7%) in Karak and Peshawar, respectively.…”
Section: Prevalencesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which is similar to previous findings in Mardan District, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan with 23.33% using cELISA [37]. However, the prevalence we estimated was slightly lower than those previously reported by Hussein et al [22] (56.25%) and by Shah et al [54] (40.7%) in Karak and Peshawar, respectively.…”
Section: Prevalencesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The PCR results revealed in sheep and goats an Anaplasma ovis prevalence rate of 16.0, 21.0, 24.0 and 26.0% for Shangla, Bajuar, Swat and Malakand districts, respectively. These prevalences are lower than those reported from Turkey (71.32%) and Pakistan (56.25%) [6,22], but higher than those reported in China (11.7%) and the United States (14%) in sheep [18,42]. Similarly, higher molecular Anaplasma prevalences have been reported in Iranian goats (38.9%) [44] and (63.7%) [2].…”
Section: Prevalencementioning
confidence: 80%
“…The most clinical signs which observed by clinical examination on infected sheep were agreed with Ayyz et al (15). Microscopic examination it's insufficient to detect the low level of Anaplasma infection (18)(19)(20), so that molecular methods used for detecting the undetected cases of infected animals (21,22). Using of the PCR technique for more specific and sensitive detecting of minimum level of Anaplasma in infected animals (23)(24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…To date, a total of 12 studies (Punjab = 3; Khyber Pakhtunkhwa = 8; Sindh = 1) has reported the occurrence of three Anaplasma species ( A. ovis , A. marginale and A. centrale ) in small ruminants ( n = 10) [ 29 , 87 , 98 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 ] and ticks ( n = 2) [ 22 , 86 ] from Pakistan (see Table 4 ). Based on these studies, the estimated overall prevalence of anaplasmosis in Pakistani small ruminants are 1.7–55.3% and 25.3–47.2% using microscopic and molecular methods, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ] and tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) ( Anaplasma , Babesia and Theileria spp.) in small ruminants from various parts of Pakistan [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Recently, using a high-throughput microfluidic technique, a broad spectrum of microorganisms in ticks collected from sheep and goats in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas of Pakistan were reported [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%