2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2018.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal decentralization, fiscal reform, and economic growth in china

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
46
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As an important institutional reform, China's fiscal decentralization is considered by many scholars and experts to be a possible breakthrough for future reform. For instance, as Ding et al (2019) summarize in a recent study, because the current fiscal decentralization does not effectively address the issue of extra-budgetary revenues which essentially gave implicit support to local governments that seek supplementary resources for local economic development, the future reform direction of decentralization should be the devolution of decision-making powers to local governments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an important institutional reform, China's fiscal decentralization is considered by many scholars and experts to be a possible breakthrough for future reform. For instance, as Ding et al (2019) summarize in a recent study, because the current fiscal decentralization does not effectively address the issue of extra-budgetary revenues which essentially gave implicit support to local governments that seek supplementary resources for local economic development, the future reform direction of decentralization should be the devolution of decision-making powers to local governments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, negative externalities of fiscal decentralisation regarding industrial structure persist. Under the system of fiscal decentralisation in China, local governments are free to choose policies according to their demand (Ding et al, 2019). To pursue capital investment and economic growth, governments intervene inappropriately in enterprises, which can cause the enterprises to lose their dominant positions.…”
Section: Fiscal Decentralisation and Industrial Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, from the substance point of view, there is a problem that the budget is a planning tool that should provide guidance in achieving organizational goals, so in substance it should contain an activity plan in accordance with the needs of each organization.Budgeting can determine the direction and policies of an organization. Budgeting is also a guideline in implementing various government and development activities.Budgeting is also a decision-making tool related to community needs and problems.In addition, budgeting is also a political tool that functions to determine political priorities which are manifested in the form of a budget (Bryer, 2018;Flink & Molina, 2017;Malgwi & Unegbu, 2012;Schick, 1969).In preparing village budgets, the Village Government in Indonesia refers to the Regulation of the Minister of Villages number 17 of 2017 concerning priority for the use of village funds, including:finance the implementation of program activities in the field of Village development, empowerment of Village communities, and finance the implementation of cross-sectoral programs and activities.Based on the results of previous research, it was found that most of the village budget allocations were only used for physical construction of infrastructure and procurement of goods.This has resulted in an increase in the welfare of rural communities and the inability of human development realized through the village budget.Whereas in theory, the existence of fiscal decentralization should be able to create more effective public services and human development, increase public participation, democracy and equity, and ultimately increase economic growth and social welfare (Bird & Vaillancourt, 2009;Ding et al, 2019;Nursini & Tawakkal, 2019;Qiao et al, 2019;Williamson, 2010).Villages in Banyumas Regency also experience budgeting problems. With 301 villages, Banyumas has the potential to develop its territory based on the development of rural areas.The budgeting problem that is also experienced by villages in Banyumas Regency is that the potential for human development is not optimal when viewed from the education sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%