“…At a current density of 0.2 A g −1 , it can be clearly seen that the coulombic efficiency (CE) of TiO 2 @MnO 2 NWAs/CC is lower than that of TiN@MnO 2 NWAs/CC, suggesting that the Zn 2+ reaction kinetics in TiO 2 @MnO 2 NWAs/CC is slow, and the existence of irreversible reactions results in a low CE, which is unfavorable for the cycling of the electrode. 5,[55][56][57][58] For long-term cycle life, TiN@MnO 2 NWAs/CC maintains outstanding cycling performance at an ultrahigh current density of 2.0 A g −1 , where the initial capacity is 186.3 mA h g −1 and then the capacity increases continuously during cycling, reaching 236.1 mA h g −1 at the 2000th cycle and returning to 189.4 mA h g −1 at the 2300th cycle, where the capacity retention is 101.6%. In contrast, the capacity of TiO 2 @MnO 2 NWAs/CC decayed continuously aer the 1000th cycle, and the capacity retention rates of TiO 2 @MnO 2 NWAs/CC and MnO 2 NSs/CC were only 14.0% and 11.9% aer 2300 cycles, respectively (Fig.…”