2006
DOI: 10.1007/11766254_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible Querying Using Structural and Event Based Multimodal Video Data Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing corresponding approaches with our work in terms of their querying capabilities, we have: Our the approach [3] extended by SQL is the simplest way to represent fuzzy information but its capabilities to support (fuzzy) spatiotemporal queries is the most limited; the approach [29] extended by SQL have adequate support for all measures in spatial queries, temporal instance queries, and spatiotemporal simple queries, but its capabilities to support fuzziness, temporal period queries, spatiotemporal range queries, and spatiotemporal behavior queries are limited; the approach [42] extended by SQL have adequate support for all measures in spatial and temporal queries, spatiotemporal simple queries, and spatiotemporal range queries, but its capabilities to support fuzziness and spatiotemporal behavior queries are limited; the approach [6] extended by XPath have adequate support for fuzziness, but its capabilities to support (fuzzy) spatiotemporal queries are limited; although the approach [16] extended by XQuery can perform fuzzy queries, its queries only can handle non-spatiotemporal information so that it is not support for fuzzy queries of fuzzy spatiotemporal data. By comparisons, our work has adequate support for all measures in categories.…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing corresponding approaches with our work in terms of their querying capabilities, we have: Our the approach [3] extended by SQL is the simplest way to represent fuzzy information but its capabilities to support (fuzzy) spatiotemporal queries is the most limited; the approach [29] extended by SQL have adequate support for all measures in spatial queries, temporal instance queries, and spatiotemporal simple queries, but its capabilities to support fuzziness, temporal period queries, spatiotemporal range queries, and spatiotemporal behavior queries are limited; the approach [42] extended by SQL have adequate support for all measures in spatial and temporal queries, spatiotemporal simple queries, and spatiotemporal range queries, but its capabilities to support fuzziness and spatiotemporal behavior queries are limited; the approach [6] extended by XPath have adequate support for fuzziness, but its capabilities to support (fuzzy) spatiotemporal queries are limited; although the approach [16] extended by XQuery can perform fuzzy queries, its queries only can handle non-spatiotemporal information so that it is not support for fuzzy queries of fuzzy spatiotemporal data. By comparisons, our work has adequate support for all measures in categories.…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%