Volume 4: Heat Transfer; Electric Power 1982
DOI: 10.1115/82-gt-156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow Distributions and Discharge Coefficient Effects for Jet Array Impingement With Initial Crossflow

Abstract: Two-dimensional arrays of circular air jets impinging on a surface parallel to the jet orifice plate are considered. The jet flow, after impingement, is constrained to exit in a single direction along the channel formed by the jet orifice plate and the impingement surface. In addition to the crossflow which originates from the jets following impingement, an initial (independent) crossflow is present which approaches the array through an upstream extension of the channel. The configurations considered are inten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the evaluation of local jet mass flows, a single discharge coefficient value was considered for all the jets assuming that there is no effect of the generated crossflow according to Florschuetz and Isoda. 22 Therefore, for long orifices and L/D ¼ 2, Hu¨ning 23 correlation provided a value of C d ¼ 0.8, which is also independent from the Reynolds number range examined in this study (Lichtarowicz et al 24 ). As expected, at a given number of holes per row, the smaller is the channel width the higher is the jet variation.…”
Section: Mass Flow Distribution and Crossflow Developmentmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…For the evaluation of local jet mass flows, a single discharge coefficient value was considered for all the jets assuming that there is no effect of the generated crossflow according to Florschuetz and Isoda. 22 Therefore, for long orifices and L/D ¼ 2, Hu¨ning 23 correlation provided a value of C d ¼ 0.8, which is also independent from the Reynolds number range examined in this study (Lichtarowicz et al 24 ). As expected, at a given number of holes per row, the smaller is the channel width the higher is the jet variation.…”
Section: Mass Flow Distribution and Crossflow Developmentmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Pressure data were used to determine the flow coefficient, C D , of the jets and its variation along the flow. The flow coefficient, C D , for an individual jet was obtained using the isentropic gas dynamic laws for flow through an orifice as used by Florschuetz and Isoda [8] …”
Section: Experimental Setup and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Florschuetz and Isoda [8] measured the pressure drop across circular orifices of a jet array. The discharge flow coefficient, C D , was found to decrease with increasing crossflow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing correlations express the Nusselt number for jet impingement as a function of Re c [7,[10][11][12][13]. The exponent, c, falls in the range 0.45-0.8.…”
Section: Correlation Of Stagnation Nusselt Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kercher and Tabakoff [8] measured the average Nusselt number of an in-line array of confined circular air jets impinging perpendicular to a flat plate. Metzger et al [9], Florschuetz et al [10][11][12], Florschuetz and Isoda [13] and Florschuetz and Su [14] investigated the heat transfer characteristics of in-line and staggered arrays of circular air jets impinging on an isothermal plate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%