2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flower-like MoS2 on graphitic carbon nitride for enhanced photocatalytic and electrochemical hydrogen evolutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optical absorption intensity in visible-light region increased with a rise in Ru loading. According to similar reports from other researchers [28,29] and the low Ru loadings in xRu/3DOM BiVO 4 , it is reasonably deduced that the bandgap energies listed in Table 2 could represent those of the xRu/ 3DOM BiVO 4 composite samples. Bandgap energies (E g ) of the samples estimated according to the Kubelka-Munk equation (Figure S2(B)) are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The optical absorption intensity in visible-light region increased with a rise in Ru loading. According to similar reports from other researchers [28,29] and the low Ru loadings in xRu/3DOM BiVO 4 , it is reasonably deduced that the bandgap energies listed in Table 2 could represent those of the xRu/ 3DOM BiVO 4 composite samples. Bandgap energies (E g ) of the samples estimated according to the Kubelka-Munk equation (Figure S2(B)) are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…[10][11][12] However, the inherent large band gap of MoS 2 leads to poor electron transport, thus resulting al arge HER overpotential. With cost-effectiveness and high electrocatalytic performance, non-noblem etal molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 )n anosheets have been extensively investigated as an efficient catalyst in HER.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure shows the XRD patterns of the single MoS 2 , g‐C 3 N 4 , binary GO/MoS 2 and ternary GO/MoS 2 /g‐C 3 N 4 samples, and all diffraction peaks could be indexed as “★” of g‐C 3 N 4 and “•” of MoS 2 . The distinct diffraction peaks of MoS 2 could be found at 32.8° and 58.0° corresponding to (100) and (110) planes of MoS 2 (JCPDS 37–1492), respectively . By comparison, the peak at 13.1° and 27.8° of g‐C 3 N 4 and GO/MoS 2 /g‐C 3 N 4 could be indexed as (100) and (002) diffraction planes (JCPDS 87–1526) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%