2010
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/37/7/073101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fluctuations and correlations in nucleus–nucleus collisions within transport models

Abstract: Abstract. Particle number fluctuations and correlations in nucleus-nucleus collisions at SPS and RHIC energies are studied within microscopic transport approaches. In this review we focus on the Hadron-String-Dynamics (HSD) and Ultra-relativisticQuantum-Molecular-Dynamics (UrQMD) models The obtained results are compared with the available experimental data as well as with the statistical models and the model of independent sources. In particular the role of the experimental centrality selection and acceptance … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the hadron multiplicities n K and n π , scaled variances ω * K and ω * π , and correlation ρ * Kπ should be found as the corresponding quantities at fixed volume (i.e., at fixed N part ). The transport model calculations demonstrate [3] that the e-by-e fluctuations of the number of participants become negligible in the sample of most central A+A collisions, e.g., one finds ω part ≪ 1 in Pb+Pb (or Au+Au) collisions with impact parameter equal to zero, b = 0. Therefore, one may define the parameters of MIS as:…”
Section: Model Of Independent Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the hadron multiplicities n K and n π , scaled variances ω * K and ω * π , and correlation ρ * Kπ should be found as the corresponding quantities at fixed volume (i.e., at fixed N part ). The transport model calculations demonstrate [3] that the e-by-e fluctuations of the number of participants become negligible in the sample of most central A+A collisions, e.g., one finds ω part ≪ 1 in Pb+Pb (or Au+Au) collisions with impact parameter equal to zero, b = 0. Therefore, one may define the parameters of MIS as:…”
Section: Model Of Independent Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For example, the fluctuations of nucleon participants strongly contribute to the scaled variances of charged particles [5], pions and kaons [3]. To avoid these unnecessary contributions one needs to make a very rigid centrality selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet some examples can be quoted. Here we want to refer to a recent review paper [17], summarizing the PhD thesis of V. Konchakovski. In particular we mention Sections 6 and 8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an event-by-event analysis, of high energy heavy ion collision data has been ongoing for several years [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Recently, this discussion was refreshed [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] in the view that (event-by-event) fluctuations of multiplicity, or of ratios of multiplicities, might serve as an observable to pin down the critical behavior of the collective, and potentially at some point of its evolution thermalized, system created when two heavy ions collide. Thus, the measurement of ratio fluctuations might make it possible to fix the values of temperature and baryon chemical potential of a critical point (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the combination of theoretically predicted signals and corresponding measurement data, has led to the emergence of a complete phase diagram of strongly interacting matter [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Unfortunately, uncertainties still exist and the present data does not seem to allow for firm conclusions, especially when it comes to the location and observation of the critical point 1 [6,7,10]. To reduce these uncertainties and to draw final conclusions about the location of the critical endpoint and the boundary of the first order transition, work into creating a careful beam-energy scan of these signals for the onset of deconfinement is currently ongoing, with further work planned for the future.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%