2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Focusing tube operational vibration as a means for monitoring the abrasive waterjet cutting capability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The focuser is shown in Figure 13 and here the following features can be seen: two orthogonal flat areas, which have been machined on the external surface and nearby the tip, before sintering; two micro-accelerometers (DYTRAN 3224A), which have been attached to each flat area by means of LOCTITE 648; the technical specifications of the accelerometers are reported in Table 4. This same focuser was used by the authors in another investigation [25], which explains the reason for having two accelerometers onboard, despite only one has been used in the present study. As a first step, an impact test has been carried out on the focuser installed on the waterjet cutting machine, in order to verify the presence of a resonance at the frequency expected by the previous study: to the scope, two impact points have been considered, one at the tip of the focuser and the other on the clamp; the two impact points are indicated in Figure 8 with the "tip" and "top" labels, respectively; five strikes have been carried out, for each impact point; the vibration has been monitored by means of one of the two accelerometers; the acquisition parameters and computation methods have been maintained the same as for the previous impact tests.…”
Section: Inline Monitoring Of the Focuser First Mode Frequency During Operationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The focuser is shown in Figure 13 and here the following features can be seen: two orthogonal flat areas, which have been machined on the external surface and nearby the tip, before sintering; two micro-accelerometers (DYTRAN 3224A), which have been attached to each flat area by means of LOCTITE 648; the technical specifications of the accelerometers are reported in Table 4. This same focuser was used by the authors in another investigation [25], which explains the reason for having two accelerometers onboard, despite only one has been used in the present study. As a first step, an impact test has been carried out on the focuser installed on the waterjet cutting machine, in order to verify the presence of a resonance at the frequency expected by the previous study: to the scope, two impact points have been considered, one at the tip of the focuser and the other on the clamp; the two impact points are indicated in Figure 8 with the "tip" and "top" labels, respectively; five strikes have been carried out, for each impact point; the vibration has been monitored by means of one of the two accelerometers; the acquisition parameters and computation methods have been maintained the same as for the previous impact tests.…”
Section: Inline Monitoring Of the Focuser First Mode Frequency During Operationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Due to its sensitivity to the wear progression, the first mode frequency is expected to gradually shift towards higher values, as operating hours are accumulated by the focuser; hence, this variable can be used as the indicator of its wear status. On this regard, the present focuser has been used in an analogous factorial study to the one discussed in [25], which overall involved 135 firings of the waterjet, each one of the duration of 30 s, and the acquisition of the correspondent accelerometer signal; the study equals to a total amount of about 4050 s of operation, which are not sufficient for bringing the focuser to a complete worn status, but could be sufficient for producing a detectable shift of the indicator. Indeed, the lower plot of Figure 16 shows the correspondent indicator computed for each one of the firings, and an upward trend is clearly exhibited; the red line is an interpolation of the experimental data points and indicates a total shift of the indicator of about 5 Hz by the end of the factorial study, with respect to its initial value; the statistical relevance of the trend is confirmed by the Mann-Kendall test [27], for a confidence level greater than 99 %.…”
Section: Inline Monitoring Of the Focuser First Mode Frequency During Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Pahuja and Ramulu [ 13 ] analysed the AE signals using wavelet packet transform (WPT) and proposed an algorithm to identify and characterize these signals. Copertaro et al [ 14 ] aimed at demonstrating that vibroacoustic sensors are the right choice for monitoring the AJW cutting capability; however, the investigation has been carried out with the cutting head in a steady position, while its movement was found to negatively affect the performance of the method. Therefore, it seems to serve rather as a calibration method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copertaro et al [5] presented the idea of mounting the accelerator sensors (PCB 352C34 ICP ceramic) using a special adapter, in which two sensors were placed relative to each other at an angle of 90 degrees in the plane parallel to the surface of the workpiece and one sensor in the axis of the cutting head. It was noted that the relevant parameter which best represents the nature of the cut is the value of the recoil force acting in the axis of the cutter head.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kovacevic et al [6] proved that in the low frequency range, the greatest influence on vibrations comes from the waterjet, while abrasive particles are responsible for vibrations above 10 kHz. In the research presented in [5], an index called the power index was determined, for which a strong linear correlation with the power of the waterjet was proven. This index helps to control stability by adjusting the pump pressure parameter and the abrasive flow rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%