2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Following beekeeping: More-than-human practice in agrifood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unaware of these benefits, the propolis obtained from colonies is just thrown away or used for cooking as it burns quickly with fire. This the case of the beekeepers from Camarines Norte (3), Camarines Sur (1), Albay (1), Sorsogon (2), Masbate (1) and Catanduanes (1). Propolis removed from the colonies during honey harvesting, and colony splitting are not valued.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unaware of these benefits, the propolis obtained from colonies is just thrown away or used for cooking as it burns quickly with fire. This the case of the beekeepers from Camarines Norte (3), Camarines Sur (1), Albay (1), Sorsogon (2), Masbate (1) and Catanduanes (1). Propolis removed from the colonies during honey harvesting, and colony splitting are not valued.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beekeeping is recognized as an important component of agrifood production as it contributes to the pollination of crops at the farm level [1]. In fact, in Malaysia, apiculture is a viable complementary livelihood of pineapple farmers in rural areas with honey as a major source of income [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across cultures and social contexts, food is intimately linked with pleasure, disgust, knowledge, skill, conviviality, social status and economic activity. Relations are determined and reinforced through distinct material characteristics-flavour, texture, growth, reproduction, patterns of decay-which are in turn subjectively perceived and acted upon by those who produce, prepare, consume and discard foods (Carolan, 2011;Hayes-Conroy & Martin, 2010;Longhurst et al, 2008;Longhurst, Ho & Johnston, 2009;Phillips, 2014;Roe, 2006;Waitt, 2014;Waitt & Phillips, 2016). In her much-cited paper, Roe (2006, p. 106) took a relational materialist approach to introduce the concept of 'things becoming food'.…”
Section: Embodied Methods In More-than-human and Food Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bear (2011) argues that in order to move animals from the shadows we need to stop speaking of them as collectives and re-focus on the individual, although more individual 'meetings' may exacerbate the feeling that the being we meet is, and shall always be, strange to us (Morton, 2010). However, as Phillips (2014) argues, a feeling of nonhuman difference can lead to ethical distance but, equally, can induce a fascination, or enchantment, that fosters a long-term desire for in-depth engagement and encourages more responsible praxis. Phillips (2014) notes that the performance of human-nonhuman relations helps to establish attachments to particular places; 'intimate practice can move well beyond the boundaries of any one relation' highlighting the 'multi-species, multi-sited, multigenerational' relations that emerge through these more-than-human entanglements (Phillips, 2014: 157).…”
Section: The More-than-human Farm: Practices and Relations Of Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%