2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3732-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foraging strategies of a generalist marine predator inhabiting a dynamic environment

Abstract: reflect changes in prey availability. Deep-diving sea lions traveled shorter distances and spent a greater proportion of time at the rookery than sea lions using the other two strategies, which may have energetic and reproductive implications. These results highlight the importance of an individual-based approach in describing the foraging behavior of female California sea lions and understanding how they respond to the seasonal and annual changes in prey availability that characterize the California Current S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gliding occasionally occurred in dives shallower than 100 m; however, the glides were brief and inconsistent between these shallower dives. Similar to previous reports on California sea lions from San Nicolas Island Ponganis, 2013, 2014;McHuron et al, 2016), all animals reached depths over 200 m, while the majority (52%) of dives were shallower than 50 m. The distribution of maximum dive depths was bimodal, with very few dives (11%) occurring at depths of 100-150 m. This bimodal pattern influenced how we defined shallow (≤100 m) and deep (>100 m) dives. Dive statistics are reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gliding occasionally occurred in dives shallower than 100 m; however, the glides were brief and inconsistent between these shallower dives. Similar to previous reports on California sea lions from San Nicolas Island Ponganis, 2013, 2014;McHuron et al, 2016), all animals reached depths over 200 m, while the majority (52%) of dives were shallower than 50 m. The distribution of maximum dive depths was bimodal, with very few dives (11%) occurring at depths of 100-150 m. This bimodal pattern influenced how we defined shallow (≤100 m) and deep (>100 m) dives. Dive statistics are reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The following dive phases were identified in the data: descent (surface to 80% maximum depth), bottom (depths within 80% maximum depth) and ascent (80% maximum depth to surface). Most California sea lion dives are shallower than 100 m, yet many adult female California sea lions from San Nicolas Island are known to be deep divers (Kuhn and Costa, 2014;McHuron et al, 2016). Therefore, to compare shallow and deep dives, dives to maximum depths >100 m were classified as deep, and dives to maximum depths ≤100 m were classified as shallow.…”
Section: Data Processing and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first study to detect an association between California sea lion foraging habitat and mesoscale activity. Sea lions are known to display extensive intraspecies variability in their at‐sea movements, behaviors, and distributions (Kuhn & Costa, ; McHuron et al., ; Melin et al., ). This is especially true during lactation, as females must continually expand and adjust their foraging behavior in response to prey movements (Melin et al., ) and direct competition for resources under a restricted range and large population size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Description of animal capture and instrumentation are provided in Kuhn and Costa () and McHuron et al. ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation