2010
DOI: 10.1002/env.1074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting climate variables using a mixed-effect state-space model

Abstract: This paper demonstrates the potential advantage of using a linear, mixed-effect state-space model for statistical downscaling of climate variables compared to the frequently used approach of linear regression. This comparison leads to the development of a method for estimation of model parameters using the EM algorithm approach. The model is applied to the prediction of temperature and rainfall statistics at both a sub-tropical and temperate location in Australia. The results indicate that for lead times of 1-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, for the updated national projections a number of more sophisticated analysis methods are being considered, such as the 'Representative Climate Futures' approach (Whetton et al 2012), multimodel stratification based on an index of tropical ocean warming (Watterson 2012), pattern scaling (Mitchell 2003) and dynamical and statistical downscaling techniques (e.g. Grose et al in press;Kokic et al 2011). Consideration will also be given to issues including model independence (Jun et al 2008) and drift (Sen Gupta et al 2012), which were not considered here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, for the updated national projections a number of more sophisticated analysis methods are being considered, such as the 'Representative Climate Futures' approach (Whetton et al 2012), multimodel stratification based on an index of tropical ocean warming (Watterson 2012), pattern scaling (Mitchell 2003) and dynamical and statistical downscaling techniques (e.g. Grose et al in press;Kokic et al 2011). Consideration will also be given to issues including model independence (Jun et al 2008) and drift (Sen Gupta et al 2012), which were not considered here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(), page 1550). This has led some researchers to consider non‐linear approaches to represent an evolving climate system such as hidden Markov chain models (Charles et al ., ; Greene et al ., ) and state space models (Berliner et al ., ; Kokic et al ., ). In this paper, the development of a spatiodynamic model was deliberate to allow some of the coefficients to vary over both time and space, as dictated by the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Evaluation of climate scenarios requires a reference 'baseline' period, that encompasses both temporal variation over the comparison climate period and is representative of present day climatology of the study region (IPCC, 1994). The baseline climate file for the region of Svay Rieng was generated from locally available observations from 1978 to 2011 for Tan Ninh in Vietnam (11.32 N, 106.1 E), using Linear Mixed-Effect State-Space (LMESS) statistical downscaling (Kokic et al, 2011). The LMESS model combines historic climate observations with downscaled climate projections from GCMs to produce effective point scale projections suitable as baseline and near-future (2021-2040) climates for use in biophysical modelling applications (Kokic et al, 2013).…”
Section: Current and Future Climatesmentioning
confidence: 99%