2009
DOI: 10.1002/jae.1075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forecasting US output growth using leading indicators: an appraisal using MIDAS models

Abstract: SUMMARYWe evaluate the predictive power of leading indicators for output growth at horizons up to 1 year. We use the MIDAS regression approach as this allows us to combine multiple individual leading indicators in a parsimonious way and to directly exploit the information content of the monthly series to predict quarterly output growth. When we use real-time vintage data, the indicators are found to have significant predictive ability, and this is further enhanced by the use of monthly data on the quarter at t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
101
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
101
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In our application we take into account a large set of pooling techniques that combine the forecasts based on MIDAS models (where monthly indicators are available) with those based on standard ARDL models (for quarterly indicator variables). While there have been some work on the combination of MIDAS-model forecasts (see, Clements and Galvão, 2009;Kuzin et al, 2009;Andreou et al, 2010), a more systematical and more complete assessment is still missing. Therefore, we conduct a comparison of pooling techniques for MIDAS models that also takes into account the different states of data availability.…”
Section: Model Combinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our application we take into account a large set of pooling techniques that combine the forecasts based on MIDAS models (where monthly indicators are available) with those based on standard ARDL models (for quarterly indicator variables). While there have been some work on the combination of MIDAS-model forecasts (see, Clements and Galvão, 2009;Kuzin et al, 2009;Andreou et al, 2010), a more systematical and more complete assessment is still missing. Therefore, we conduct a comparison of pooling techniques for MIDAS models that also takes into account the different states of data availability.…”
Section: Model Combinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative framework has been proposed by Ghysels et al (2004); Andreou et al (2011) and has been recently applied by Clements and Galvão (2009) and Marcellino and Schumacher (2010) to macroeconomic forecasting. We follow their procedure which is called MIxed DAta Sampling (henceforth MIDAS) regression models and is meant to circumvent the problems of quarterly conversion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Applications of mixed frequency models to nowcast GDP growth in the U.S. or euro area include Clements and Galvão (2008), Clements andGalvão (2009), Marcellino andSchumacher (2010), Kuzin, Marcellino, and Schumacher (2011), Angelini, Camba-Mendez, Giannone, Reichlin, and Rünstler (2011), Andreou, Ghysels, and Kourtellos (2013, Kuzin, Marcellino, and Schumacher (2013) among others. The general finding is that these nowcasting models generally outperform models using quarterly frequency only, and are comparable to judgmental forecasts.…”
Section: The Forecasting Process: Institutional Backgrounds and Data mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has also been much interest in data vintages and forecasting, as the use of …nal-revised data may give a misleading impression relative to the use of data available at the time in pseudo real-time forecasting exercises (see, for example, Diebold and Rudebusch (1991), Faust, Rogers and Wright (2003), and the recent review by Croushore (2006)). Recently, a number of authors have considered how to specify forecasting models when there are various data vintage estimates of the same observation (see, e.g., Koenig, Dolmas and Piger (2003), Clements and Galvão (2008b) and Clements and Galvão (2008a)). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%