Forging Unity: European Commission Leadership in the Brexit Negotiations

Abstract

This article explains why the European Union has remained strikingly cohesive during the Brexit withdrawal negotiations by focussing on the role played by its negotiator: the European Commission'’s Task Force 50. The analysis demonstrates that the Task Force 50 set out to forge unity among the EU27 by exercising both subtle instrumental and direct political leadership. The Commission significantly influenced the outcome of the negotiations by shaping the agenda and process, brokering deals, and ultimately achieving a withdrawal agreement that all member states signed up to. Its transparent and consultative behaviour generated trust among member states, which allowed the Commission to play such a prominent role. These findings challenge the prevailing view that the EU has become increasingly intergovernmental at expense of the Commission. Drawing on original interviews, the article substantiates this argument by tracing the Commission's leadership activities in the run‐up to and throughout the withdrawal negotiations (2016–20).

The EU Institutional Architecture in the Covid‐19 Response: Coordinative Europeanization in Times of Permanent Emergency

“…Instead, this time the focus was on coordination with the member states at early stages and often via the Commission in order to devise policies that would work for everyone. A similar approach was successfully adopted during the Brexit withdrawal negotiations when the Commission created the Task Force 50 to guarantee unity among member states (Schuette, 2021). Our analysis reveals that this new coordinative Europeanization is characterized by discursive coordination and the persuasive power of ideas (Schmidt, 2021) and also by a swifter decision‐making process facilitated by existing crisis management mechanisms developed over the past 12 years of ‘crisis’.…”

The show must go on: The EU's quest to sustain multilateral institutions since 2016

“…This mechanism builds on the understanding that multilateral institutions have a degree of The EU's quest to sustain multilateral institutions agency separate from their member states (Barnett and Finnemore 2004;Hawkins et al 2006;Pollack 2003). As they are actors in their own right, multilateral institutions can try to resist (or ignore) external pressures, particularly when they come under direct contestation by a key member state(s) (e.g., Debre and Dijkstra 2021;Hirschmann 2021;Schuette 2021a;Dijkstra et al 2022). Multilateral institutions are not alone when trying to resist such challenges (Dijkstra 2017): They can rely on like-minded actors, including other member states, NGOs and also the EU.…”

Negotiating secession: Brexit lessons for Scottish independence

“…Exit is also associated with increased in-group solidarity among the remaining members. This was reflected in the high levels of unity among the EU27 during the Brexit process (Jensen and Kelstrup 2019; Laffan 2019), high levels of trust among and between the EU institutions, and especially of the Commission and Taskforce 50 (Schuette 2021), and evidence of increasing identification with the EU among citizens (DeVries 2017). Brexit also led Eurosceptic populist parties to moderate their message on the value of exit (Van Kessel et al 2020).…”

“…That withdrawal takes place within the legal and constitutional framework of the broader union has a significant bearing on the process. The institutional structured crafted by the EU to oversee the Brexit process was designed both to ensure unity at the highest level through the European Council but also to draw on the expertise and political independence of the Commission (Schuette 2021). British representatives and party groupings in the Parliament sympathetic to Brexit were ostracised through this process (Bressanelli et al 2019) and the UK exercised little 'voice' as a result (McEwen and Murphy, forthcoming).…”