2002
DOI: 10.1080/714922606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation and emission of fine particles from two coal-fired power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the RE factors of Si are quite consistent in the experiments, being mostly between 0.7 and 0.8. The results are in line with a number of studies, showing that Si is of low volatility in pulverized coal combustion and the content of Si in submicron particles are slightly lower than that in larger fly ash particles [13,27]. The results also indicate that the additives do not have significant effect on the volatility of Si.…”
Section: Volatility Of Si and Crsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It can be seen that the RE factors of Si are quite consistent in the experiments, being mostly between 0.7 and 0.8. The results are in line with a number of studies, showing that Si is of low volatility in pulverized coal combustion and the content of Si in submicron particles are slightly lower than that in larger fly ash particles [13,27]. The results also indicate that the additives do not have significant effect on the volatility of Si.…”
Section: Volatility Of Si and Crsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although ESPs and FGD devices can effectively remove large particles, their removal efficiency for PM 10 and PM 2.5 is relatively low. Therefore, 50.0%-80.0% of the particles in stack aerosols are in the PM 2.5 range (Nielsen et al, 2002;Wang et al, 2011). Moreover, selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technology has become increasingly widely used to reduce NO x emissions in China, and approximately 92.0% of coal-fired power units adopted SCR technology by the end of 2015 (MEP, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WFGD can further remove primary PM 2.5 (especially PM 1-2.5 ), but it generates new particles (especially PM 1 ) (Meij, 1994;Farthing et al, 2004;Nielsen et al, 2002). In this study, the PM 0.1 mass concentration presented a great increase even though the PM 2.5 mass concentration at WFGD outlet showed a slight decrease (Fig.…”
Section: New Problems Caused By Apcdsmentioning
confidence: 52%