2011
DOI: 10.1080/14608944.2011.629426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forming new national identities: a retrospective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of Italians’ ambivalent feelings toward the EU, this institution was perceived as an external entity that did little to support Italy during the emergency and was therefore considered an outgroup by most Italians ( Laflan, 2004 ). This was likely to be further accentuated by the fact that during the first weeks of the pandemic, the media in other European countries portrayed the Italian government and national health system as culpably unprepared to cope with the virus, thus strengthening in-group boundaries increasing the gap between an “us” (ingroup) and a “them” (outgroup) ( Jelen, 2011 ). In other words, these conjoint factors strengthened the salience of a social identity as Italians and in its national institutions in contrast to supranational ones ( Ruiz Jiménez et al, 2004 ; Harttgen and Opfinger, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In light of Italians’ ambivalent feelings toward the EU, this institution was perceived as an external entity that did little to support Italy during the emergency and was therefore considered an outgroup by most Italians ( Laflan, 2004 ). This was likely to be further accentuated by the fact that during the first weeks of the pandemic, the media in other European countries portrayed the Italian government and national health system as culpably unprepared to cope with the virus, thus strengthening in-group boundaries increasing the gap between an “us” (ingroup) and a “them” (outgroup) ( Jelen, 2011 ). In other words, these conjoint factors strengthened the salience of a social identity as Italians and in its national institutions in contrast to supranational ones ( Ruiz Jiménez et al, 2004 ; Harttgen and Opfinger, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of nation can be identified with its institutions resulting in the establishment of in-group boundaries ( Jelen, 2011 ), and fostering a sense of belonging and national identity ( Harttgen and Opfinger, 2014 ). According to Gibson and Condor (2009) , national institutions can be considered as hybrid entities including group of peoples, material objects (buildings, places), and procedures (laws, constitutions, government measures).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%