2018
DOI: 10.22159/ijap.2018v10i1.22615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulation and in Vitro Evaluation of Bromocriptine Mesylate as Fast Dissolving Oral Film

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to formulate and in vitro evaluate fast dissolving oral film of practically insoluble bromocriptine mesylate to enhance its solubility and to improve its oral bioavailability by avoiding first pass effect as well as to produce an immediate release action of the drug from the film for an efficient management of diabetes mellitus type II in addition to an improvement of the patient compliance to this patientfriendly dosage form. Methods:The films were prepared by the solvent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So different film-forming polymers gave different DT value as shown in the fig. 1: As expressed in table 3 in which the mechanical properties of OFDFs are listed, the film prepared with HPMC E5 (F1) as film-forming polymer gave satisfactory % E (21.1±0.2), excellent folding endurance value (450±5.5), with low value of youngʼs modulus (105±0.3) and the tensile strength, is about (6.5±0.2), these outcomes were in concurrence with those that reported by Tamer et al [27].…”
Section: Effect Of Different Types Of Polymerssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So different film-forming polymers gave different DT value as shown in the fig. 1: As expressed in table 3 in which the mechanical properties of OFDFs are listed, the film prepared with HPMC E5 (F1) as film-forming polymer gave satisfactory % E (21.1±0.2), excellent folding endurance value (450±5.5), with low value of youngʼs modulus (105±0.3) and the tensile strength, is about (6.5±0.2), these outcomes were in concurrence with those that reported by Tamer et al [27].…”
Section: Effect Of Different Types Of Polymerssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The mechanical properties of formulas (F1, F7, F8 and F9) were shown in table 3, which illustrated that as the plasticizer concentration increased the young's modulus and the tensile strength decreased. This is due to the fact that the intermolecular forces between polymer chains weakened upon increasing the concentration of plasticizer thus the rigidity of the threedimensional structure formed upon drying decreased [27].…”
Section: Effect Of Selected Polymer (Hpmc E5) Combinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While F1 (55.8%) and F6 (56.9%) showed, non-significant increment (p>0.05) in D2 min value this may be due to that both plasticizers are water dissolvable and they will diffuse out from the strips in watery media creating void spots in the strip through which distribution of liquid happens to enable strip breaking down leading to improve release profile of drug [35], as shown in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Effect Of Different Plasticizer Types On In Vitro/in Vivo Dtmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It was measured by using a standard Vernier caliper. Six films were measured at five positions, and average thickness was calculated (11) .…”
Section: Thickness Of the Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FE was determined by manual repeated folding of film at specified site until it breaks or cracks, and average values were calculated and reported. FE of more than 300 gives a good idea about the flexibility and toughness of the formulation (11) .…”
Section: Folding Endurance (Fe)mentioning
confidence: 99%