2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2018.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulations and algorithms for the Pickup and Delivery Traveling Salesman Problem with Multiple Stacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another variation arises when considering a pickup and delivery traveling salesman problem with multiple stacks, where the nodes to visit are not necessarily split into two separate regions. A large neighborhood search was proposed for this generalization by Côté et al [18], whereas both Pereira and Urrutia [19] and Sampaio and Urrutia [20] presented branch-and-cut algorithms.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another variation arises when considering a pickup and delivery traveling salesman problem with multiple stacks, where the nodes to visit are not necessarily split into two separate regions. A large neighborhood search was proposed for this generalization by Côté et al [18], whereas both Pereira and Urrutia [19] and Sampaio and Urrutia [20] presented branch-and-cut algorithms.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, there is an increase in the flexibility of loading/unloading operations, which can lead to a reduction in the operating costs of transport. The PDTSPMS was mainly treated by exact algorithms, which employ different and efficient branch-and-cut algorithms (Côté et al, 2009;Sampaio and Urrutia, 2016;Pereira and Urrutia, 2018). Petersen and Madsen (2009) introduced the DTSPMS from a real-world case that a software company encountered with one of its customers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, there is an increase in the flexibility of loading/unloading operations, which can lead to a reduction in transportation costs. The PDTSPMS was mainly treated by exact algorithms that employ different branch‐and‐cut schemes (Côté et al., 2009; Sampaio and Urrutia, 2017; Pereira and Urrutia, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their computational results are compatible to those obtained by . Pereira and Urrutia (2018) have proposed new valid inequalities and two formulations with ad hoc branch-and-cut algorithms for the SVPDP with multiple stacks. Compared to the methods of and Sampaio and Urrutia (2017), their algorithm is faster and solved some instances that were previously unsolved.…”
Section: The Pickup and Delivery Problem With Multiple Stacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LIFO loading or first-in-first-out (FIFO) loading (see, e.g.,Carrabs, Cerulli, and Cordeau 2007;Carrabs, Cordeau, and Laporte 2007;Erdogan, Cordeau, and Laporte 2009;Cordeau, Dell'Amico, and Iori 2010;Li et al 2011), and the pickup and delivery problem with time windows and LIFO loading (PDPTWL) (see, e.g.,Cherkesly, Desaulniers, and Laporte 2015;Alyasiry, Forbes, and Bulmer 2019), for the single-stack case.For the multiple stacks case there are papers on the single-vehicle pickup and delivery problem with multiple stacks (see, e.g.,Sampaio and Urrutia 2017;Pereira and Urrutia 2018), the double traveling salesman problem with multiple stacks (DTSPMS) (see, e.g.,Petersen and Madsen 2009;Felipe, Ortuño, and Tirado 2009;Petersen, Archetti, and Speranza 2010;Lusby et al 2010;Carrabs, Cerulli, and Speranza 2013;Alba Martínez et al 2013), and the double vehicle routing problem with multiple stacks (DVRPMS)(Iori and Riera-Ledesma 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%