2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

15
1,594
2
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,263 publications
(1,621 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
15
1,594
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…GO laminates soaked in liquid water showed d ≈ 13.7 ± 0.3 Å. All these values agree with previous reports, where the changes in d were attributed to successive incorporation of water molecules into various sites between GO sheets 31 . Individual GO strips with desirable d were then encapsulated and stacked together using Stycast epoxy as shown in Figs.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…GO laminates soaked in liquid water showed d ≈ 13.7 ± 0.3 Å. All these values agree with previous reports, where the changes in d were attributed to successive incorporation of water molecules into various sites between GO sheets 31 . Individual GO strips with desirable d were then encapsulated and stacked together using Stycast epoxy as shown in Figs.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…To further understand the liquid water flux and salt rejection properties of GO-Gr membranes, we have performed forward osmosis (FO) 31,32 experiments. FO is relatively a new alternative technology to the conventional pressure-driven reverse osmosis (RO) membrane process, where hydraulic pressure is not required for its operation 31,32 .…”
Section: Swelling-controlled Graphene Oxide-graphene (Go-gr)membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NaCl) (Cath et al, 2006). FO can directly pre-66 concentrate wastewater without significant external energy input (Alturki et …”
Section: Introduction 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a FO process, water transports across a selectively permeable membrane spontaneously from a region of higher water chemical potential (feed solution) to a region of lower water chemical potential (draw solution) (Qin et al, 2012). This results in the concentration of the feed solution and dilution of the draw solution (Cath et al, 2006). It is traditionally believed that the FO process has the advantages of no or low pressure operation, higher water flux and recovery rate, less fouling propensity and easy cleaning (Chung et al, 2012;Duong and Chung, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%