TENCON 2008 - 2008 IEEE Region 10 Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/tencon.2008.4766475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractal feature based ECG arrhythmia classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FD gives a quantitative indication of the chaotic behavior of a signal, and is also related to the degree of interference of the signal, which is inversely related to the 'smoothness' of the signal (Mesin, Cescon, Gazzoni, Merletti, & Rainoldi, 2009a). At least eight different methods for estimating FD of sEMG waveforms have been applied in literature, including the box-counting method (Barnsley & Hurd, 1989), the Hurst exponent (Hurst, 1951), a method based on power spectral density (Kaplan, 1999;Raghav & Mishra, 2008;Spasic, 2007), the methods proposed by (Higuchi, 1988), (Sevcik, 2010), (Petrosian, 1995) and (Katz, 1988) and two variants of the latter (Castiglioni, 2010). These methods were compared and reviewed by (Coelho & Lima, 2014), who evidenced that the normalized version of the Katz's estimation method, followed by the Hurst exponent, significantly outperform the others in terms of generating more discriminatory features.…”
Section: Fractal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FD gives a quantitative indication of the chaotic behavior of a signal, and is also related to the degree of interference of the signal, which is inversely related to the 'smoothness' of the signal (Mesin, Cescon, Gazzoni, Merletti, & Rainoldi, 2009a). At least eight different methods for estimating FD of sEMG waveforms have been applied in literature, including the box-counting method (Barnsley & Hurd, 1989), the Hurst exponent (Hurst, 1951), a method based on power spectral density (Kaplan, 1999;Raghav & Mishra, 2008;Spasic, 2007), the methods proposed by (Higuchi, 1988), (Sevcik, 2010), (Petrosian, 1995) and (Katz, 1988) and two variants of the latter (Castiglioni, 2010). These methods were compared and reviewed by (Coelho & Lima, 2014), who evidenced that the normalized version of the Katz's estimation method, followed by the Hurst exponent, significantly outperform the others in terms of generating more discriminatory features.…”
Section: Fractal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the higher the complexity of the signal, the larger the corresponding FD value [7]. Therefore, many scholars have introduced FD into the research of signal processing in the medical field, such as electroencephalograms (EEG) [8] and electrocardiograms (ECG) [9][10][11][12], and have made remarkable achievements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of the works in the open literature has extensively tested and validated a fractal dimension based ECG signal classification algorithm. In one of the earlier works [27], the authors have tried using local fractal dimension based nearest neighbor classifier for ECG signal based arrhythmia classification, and results were encouraging. The current work is an expanded version of the earlier work and here we have done some addition to the base algorithm and have validated it extensively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%