2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11141-015-9621-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractal Model of a Compact Intracloud Discharge. I. Features of the Structure and Evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we assume a factor of 2 different threshold fields for positive (superscript “+”) and negative (superscript “‐”) polarities: Eith+=1.340.3emMVfalse/normalm, Eith=2.680.3emMVfalse/normalm, Epth+=0.310.3emMVfalse/normalm, and Epth=0.620.3emMVfalse/normalm at an altitude of 1 km, which corresponds to the height of our computational domain center above ground level. Similar streamer propagation fields were obtained experimentally by Allen and Mikropoulos () and theoretically estimated by Gallimberti et al () for positive polarity and adopted for both polarities in a number of lightning development models (Iudin & Davydenko, ; Iudin et al, , ; Mansell et al, , Tan et al, ). Note that in this study Eith+ and Eith apply only to the initiation of first collective streamer from the node representing the space stem and that, because of Eith>Eith+, the first streamer is always positive and, hence, Eith is not needed in modeling the initiation of streamers from the space stem.…”
Section: Model Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we assume a factor of 2 different threshold fields for positive (superscript “+”) and negative (superscript “‐”) polarities: Eith+=1.340.3emMVfalse/normalm, Eith=2.680.3emMVfalse/normalm, Epth+=0.310.3emMVfalse/normalm, and Epth=0.620.3emMVfalse/normalm at an altitude of 1 km, which corresponds to the height of our computational domain center above ground level. Similar streamer propagation fields were obtained experimentally by Allen and Mikropoulos () and theoretically estimated by Gallimberti et al () for positive polarity and adopted for both polarities in a number of lightning development models (Iudin & Davydenko, ; Iudin et al, , ; Mansell et al, , Tan et al, ). Note that in this study Eith+ and Eith apply only to the initiation of first collective streamer from the node representing the space stem and that, because of Eith>Eith+, the first streamer is always positive and, hence, Eith is not needed in modeling the initiation of streamers from the space stem.…”
Section: Model Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…All presently existing numerical models describing lightning discharge development (see, e.g., Davydenko & Iudin, 2016;Iudin & Davydenko, 2015;Iudin et al, , 2017Mansell et al, 2002Mansell et al, , 2010Riousset et al, 2007;Tan et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2016) do not consider the difference in fields required for propagation of positive and negative streamers. This polarity asymmetry is well known from laboratory spark studies, which indicate that the fields in streamer zones of positive and negative leaders, which are approximately constant, differ by about a factor of 2 and are equal to about 5 and 10 kV/cm, respectively (Gorin & Shkilev, 1976;Raizer, 2009, p. 596).…”
Section: Appendix A: Polarity Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation is a differential analog of the Rompe‐Weitzel formula for the conductivity of long spark channel [see Dulzon et al , ; Rompe and Weizel , ]. A similar approach was recently used by Iudin and Davydenko [], Davydenko and Iudin [] to describe the preliminary stage of compact intracloud discharges [e.g., Nag and Rakov , , ]. In contrast to the present model, they considered the development of streamer‐type discharges, which are characterized by relatively small currents, lower initial conductance of the channel, and smaller spatial extent.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, a lack of studies to understand the physical mechanism that enables CIDs to produce strong HF/VHF radiation, except the work by Iudin and Davydenko (2015) and Davydenko and Iudin (2016). Based on fractal modeling results, they suggested that CIDs are produced as a two-step process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%