Encyclopedia of Optimization 2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-74759-0_189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractional Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, theρ j and ρ j are optimal values of certain fractional linear programs (see e.g. Frenk and Schaible 2004). Clearly λ (1) > 0 iff 1 − 4 > 0, λ (2) > 0 iff 3 − 4 < 0, λ (3) > 0 iff 1 − 2 < 0 and λ (4) > 0 iff 2 − 3 > 0.…”
Section: 4)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hence, theρ j and ρ j are optimal values of certain fractional linear programs (see e.g. Frenk and Schaible 2004). Clearly λ (1) > 0 iff 1 − 4 > 0, λ (2) > 0 iff 3 − 4 < 0, λ (3) > 0 iff 1 − 2 < 0 and λ (4) > 0 iff 2 − 3 > 0.…”
Section: 4)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…where X is a nonempty subset of R n , f i (x) and g i (x) are continuous on X and g i (x) are positive on X [10]. Further, if we assume 1.…”
Section: Generalized Fractional Programmingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…can be solved by various algorithms (Frenk and Schaible (2001)) in which most of them are based on the Dinkelbach method, we adopt the Dinkelbach-type-2 algorithm (Crouzeix, Ferland and Schaible (1986)) for its refined function in order to enhance the convergent performance. This algorithm is introduced as follows:…”
Section: Preference Approach To Fuzzy Linear Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the principle of maximizing the minimal degree of all membership functions, a non-linear auxiliary crisp model is derived in this study for the considered fuzzy optimization problem. Since the auxiliary model is characterized as a generalized fractional program (GFP), it can be solved by various existing algorithms (Frenk and Schaible (2001)), such as the Dinkelbach method. Then, a refined version, namely, the Dinkelbach-type-2 algorithm (Crouzeix, Ferland and Schaible (1986)), is introduced in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%